Quote from: Rikafip on Today at 05:30:44 PM

Quote from: stompix on Today at 04:33:09 PM

This is exactly my point, every single one of the strat-ups you were assigned as an advisor has failed, but you have failed to advise investors about that. Since nobody is forcibly appointing you to them it simply means you've bet on the loser team five times in a row, so why would that change now?

Crypto rent-a-advisors is another tragicomic story..I planned for a long time to make topic about those leeches that are ready to "advise" and sell their name for a couple of bucks but somehow never wrote it. And worst of all, they usually don't have any repercussions, they just go from one project to another, selling their name so scammy projects looks more legit. Some of those specimens are also on BDAM advisory board.

https://i.postimg.cc/PqtyzvwF/bdam-advisors.png

I saw those two weasels ( Martin Ploom and Frederik Lund) on bunch of scammy projects and honestly when I see them, in my mind there is immediately something dodgy with the project. BDAM is no exception, if they ever vetted those two and projects they "advised" they wouldn't touch them with a ten foot pole.

Martin I had a chance to speak with I don't know his prior track record but he brought on frederik (don't the know his back ground) all I know is Martin had insight in decentralization smartcredit.io and fredrik was really just a legal reference but never even spoke to the guy but got his insight through martin.