Quote from: jamesburk on April 21, 2021, 05:12:42 PM

To the Mooncoin Community:

There are now over 200 signatures to the Mooncoin Statement of Guiding Principles. We thank all of those who have signed the document to enable widespread support for the points contained within.

We, the six original signers of the document, are now in discussions on how to move the project forward in tangible ways. We want to reiterate point #1 which is a cease fire on all accusations and attacks, especially those against our group of 6, which include the senior developers who have kept the blockchain up and running for the past several years. Those who violate this cease fire and continue to accuse and attack will not have a voice in the planning discussions for the project which we are undertaking.

Please stay tuned to our official channels on Telegram, Bitcointalk Forum, Reddit, and Facebook for future updates.

Signed,

James L. Burk, Vice President, The Moon Society

George E. Pidiktakis, Mooncoin Investor

Michelle Sakayama "michi", Mooncoin Core Developer and Engineer

Andrea G. Scarpa "agswinner", Mooncoin Investor

Mark Barry, Mooncoin Core Developer

Phillip Stanton "mebagger", Mooncoin Core Developer

Hi James, congratulations on the work for the development of Mooncoin.

I will make some observations and my opinion on the document signed by '200 members of the community'

I didn't subscribe, and others persons with more time in Mooncoin, do you intend to make efforts to add these people?

I do not see decentralized communities with information centralizing sites, it is possible for several pages to coexist, obviously the more sites with "Mooncoin" flag the better it will be for the popularize Mooncoin.

I also do not believe that 200 people from the Mooncoin community signed this term of commitment, as there was an airdrop 4000Moon involved. I've done several airdrops and already distributed millions of Moon, but always with the intuition to divulge something related to Mooncoin, not to create an illusion of volume of votes, The number of one voting quest need should be as neutral as possible in order to have a real sense of voters who read, agreed and signed.

'An official or semi-official mining pool should be set up and detailed instructions given to the community on how to mine with ASICs, to build the network-wide hash rate.'

I see this as a limiting and centralizing factor, not essential.