Quote from: count_cyrpto on March 14, 2014, 04:09:17 PM

Quote from: antonio8 on March 14, 2014, 04:07:13 PM

Quote from: cbuchner1 on March 14, 2014, 01:32:56 PM

Quote from: ivanlabrie on March 14, 2014, 12:59:01 PM

is ready!

Christian, did you think about adding a fee in the program, similarly to all those protoshares miners for ypool do?
That would make it more profitable for you to share the software earlier perhaps.

Say a 2.5% fee. That would be fair.

as I stated, I haven't even begun thinking about modalities for a release yet. I am still in development mode here.
But I appreciate your input.

Whatever I do, this has to be agreed on with the other Christian Wink

Christian

I feel you guys should add a fee in also. It is up to use,the public, to decide if we want to use miner.

I understand that it can be edited out but I feel that most people would appreciate the work from the authors and leave it alone. If it wasn't for their work we would not be making the profit.

I have been using the YPool Cudaminer that has a 3% fee. I know someone went in and changed it to that because original it was 6%. That was a little unfair on top of the 5% fee from Ypool in my opion. Well the author changed it to 6% because he had it at 10% to begin within. But the point is the person deserves some kind of copensation for their work and time put into the work involved.

JMHO.

Agreed.

I also have no issue with paying a fee.

i'd also pay the fee, yes theoretically someone could build a fee-less binary with the source, but i think most people here would actually pay a few percent fee voluntarily if they get 10x performance compared to only cpu. i think the willingness of paying a fee is much higher than donating, especially with some of the more hardcore libertarian folks here

edit: it would also be interesting to see how many people actually use cudaminer