Quote from: AKalinousky on Today at 11:48:48 AM

first of all you sound a bit haughty and arrogant, we are all friends here.

Hahaha, wake up!
You should visit the reputation board to see how many are friends here.

Quote from: AKalinousky on Today at 11:48:48 AM

who said anything about "give for free the hard-earned money"? equal distribution does not mean expropriate and redistribute. it means redestribute on market base principals.

So you plan a distribution without a redistribution, that is the part that might work, again not in this world but in your dreams yeah, definitely possible.!

Quote from: AKalinousky on Today at 11:48:48 AM

the point is that people's money has to be people's money/

Yeah, so my money is also people's money since it's my family's money, our keys our coins not your business!

That aside I'm amazed by the tsunami of users that have finally found out a way to fight poverty, we redistribute all bitcoins so everyone would have some $, how much? Probably 0.000001 cents since at the first sign of a wealth redistribution being possible it means that BTC has stopped serving its main purpose, it will be a useless coin under the control of an entity, goodbye decentralization, goodbye being your own bank, goodbye value.
So everybody could have some BTC as it would be useless.

Quote from: davis196 on Today at 12:06:23 PM

I don't get your idea about equal distribution.OK everyone will get the same amount of BTC,but what happens after that?Some people will lose their BTC due to scams(or forget their passwords and private keys),other people will waste their BTC,buying stuff they don't need or playing crypto gambling.Eventually the BTC will be concentrated in the hands of a few wealthy people.That's how capitalism works.

But, but this time it will work!
This is the time when redistribution and taking everything from the rich will definitely work and we will not all end dirt poor like all the times in history this stunt has been tried. This time!
Whenever there is talk about some money and some having more here comes somebody with the same idea, we should take some who that from that side and give it to that side and make sure the proportion stays right all the time and the object itself doesn't lose value and ignoring all basic economics they still keep pushing this! I don't know why in this case but I have a feeling in most it's not because they care so much about the poor people but it's rather pure envy and the ones that have more.

Quote from: NeuroticFish on Today at 01:44:55 PM

Nope, it won't. You imagine the somebody who doesn't have money for food will buy a smartphone, connect to the internet, get 121$ and then pays 5-10$ in fees to spend it? And then use it for every day currency?

You're starting to sound more and more like an infidel! Wink

Are you saying that all those rumors about people in Venezuela relying on BTC to buy the daily food they need might not be true? Cheesy

LE:
How did I miss this one:

Quote from: AKalinousky on Today at 11:48:48 AM

> bitcoin supply: 21,000,000
>> minus 3,700,000 }
>>> total: 17,300,000

in case of equale distribution: 17,300,000 / 7,800,000,000 = 0.00221794 sat per person

There are only 18,700,000 coins in circulation at this moment so its 15,000,000 not 17,300,000