Quote from: sujonali1819 on Today at 05:02:58 PM

Quote from: antimonycoin on Today at 07:00:57 AM

The first whitepaper yes was plagiarism because I assigned one individual to make it that affirm to be a specialist and now it is out of the team, for that doesn't mean that rest of us are scam or the project is a scam. It was a mistake from my side of too much trust that has been rectified.

This is the common excuse from the most of the project which was accused here in past. And this is the common mistake ( plagiarize whitepaper ) by a project who make scam after token sale or ico. Then what you will realize by seeing your project which has copied others whitepaper to make it own?

What you said in above message that you worked hard to build this project and the twitter, fb profile was created atleast a year ago. I really like and every project should work hard to make it successful. But if you do little more hard works to make the whitepaper unique without plagiarism, or atleast you should revise the whitepaper before publishing it (since it was written by other).

Do you have idea of what are you talking? this profile was created one year ago? https://www.facebook.com/silviu.rusu.9 Huh

? are you jocking? come there and video chat with me and I will add to my friends to see how old it is, and yes I did a new white paper that is right here:

https://www.antimonycoin.com/wp-content/uploads/atmnwhitepaper.pdf

Was the only one defect found then another haters come in and make several accuses with non-sense.