Quote from: labprocedure on Today at 01:31:44 AM

Quote from: VALERYSMYL on May 16, 2021, 01:12:46 PM

Quote from: deedeeranged on May 14, 2021, 02:48:39 PM

Quote from: VALERYSMYL on May 06, 2021, 07:40:26 AM

Quote from: underweba on May 05, 2021, 07:23:20 PM

Quote from: VALERYSMYL on May 05, 2021, 06:30:29 PM

Quote from: nsummy on May 04, 2021, 06:05:43 PM

Quote from: underweba on May 03, 2021, 09:30:25 PM

Quote from: P00P135 on May 03, 2021, 09:17:52 PM

Why even take the chance with possible malware? These usually end up taking more than the actual dev fee and go right to the creator of the program.

Look:

- source code is open for anyone to check
- .exe was tested on virustotal and antiscan.me with no positive results

what else can I say?
people are free to analyse and choose to use it or not.

I'm being the most transparent possible.

Normally I would call something like this a scam, virus, etc. but the source code is listed. Everyone has the ability to analyze the code and compile it themselves. I probably won't use this simply because I want to support the dev, but I think the community does need more people like OP, who make free software that is mining related

It is a scam as I found some shares being redirected to this dev's wallet, not ours.

That's impossible.
Please analyse the source code.
Send my any proof by private message so we can dig further on that issue.

Double-check that you started the add-on before the miner

"That's impossible."
You are so funny or desperate.
The source code is not the same after I decompile the executable. I've found your wallet address inside.

Leech, stealing hashrate from others.

Then you do not mind to give us proof itstead of just saying what you say. The truth is in ther proof you show us and no not just copy/paste but a fully explain how and what you used to decompile it.
And bytheway did you compile it yourself or downloaded the .exe file from just somewhere.
Show us with exact steps you took.
Then I might believe you but not before we all have seen the proof.

cheers

It was quite easy to do with x64dbg.
If you go to github you'll find dev's wallet is: 0x851EAa1169f02D4Da54994f9c1C1556636b97279

https://i.imgur.com/Cypa3yS.jpg

Using x64dbg, you only need to look for the same exact address. See what I found out below.
Essentially, at some point, the program may intercept dev fee and will redirect it to this wallet, perhaps partially or entirely, but it will.
You can go dipper in the code to see exactly what's going on.

https://i.imgur.com/TjUW5Oz.jpg

Cheers

I'm not an expert with this stuff but I wasn't able to reproduce your results. Searching for a string containing that wallet address came up with nothing. Can you provide some direction on how you found it?

https://ibb.co/KmCFKJv

You can't reproduce the results because this user (VALERYSMYL) is scamming my topic with false information.
There's no wallet inside.
You can compile it by yourself or disassemble the release.
Or check if the devFee's are really being diverted to your wallet as expected.