Quote from: condoras on Today at 09:51:33 AM

Quote from: sunsilk on June 03, 2021, 10:44:11 PM

Now, after all of those forced to give positive feed back. We're now seeing them go the other way round.

If those users have been saying that they weren't paid, well then that's believable than of those who have seem to comment as if they're posted automatedly.

Positive feedback of what exactly? That they get back the 50% of their funds without any concrete and solid proof? Whatever those newbies/ bots/ shills post doesn't prove a single thing. And yes, it's "easier" to believe that nobody gets anything from them. It makes much more sense. The thing is that if we don't make a group complainant (with all the difficulties that this action includes and require), we won't get anything back. Sad

Those 50% payment that were posted automatedly, they were just forced positive feedback somehow but it's true that it lacks of evidence that they actually got paid. It is more believable to see these complains than those shills and I agree to you that there's no proof about those claims.

And those posts are unlikely to stop, they'll keep on posting it and believes that there will be more people that will believe that they actually got the money that they've promised to give.