Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 06:24:06 PM

Quote from: cn567 on Today at 06:10:57 PM

No Saylor didn't tweeted it but with the speed they are accumulating it won't be a shock that they own 20% of Bitcoin

No, I'm pretty sure that it'll be a shock. Owning 20% of Bitcoin means around 3,7 million bitcoins. Even if we assumed that exchange rate stayed the same (that will not, but anyway IF) they'd need around 129.5 billion dollars. Quite hard when MicroStrategy's net worth doesn't exceed the 10 digits.

Quote from: cn567 on Today at 06:10:57 PM

See tbh I also don't know am I right or wrong I just had a thought and wanted people's opinion what I am thinking is right or wrong, but trust me HODLING BTC is not a good thing ONLY IF YOU WANT IT TO BE A CURRENCY, otherwise if you treat it as a Digital Gold which was it meant to be then HODLING is not at all a issue.

There's no reason to use bold and uppercase together, it's annoying and it feels like you're yelling. Whoever is satisfied with Bitcoin's functionalities can use it as a currency; it has properties that the traditional banking system lacks of.

I think my bold and capital letters have affected your eyes please read it again, Let us forget Michale Saylor

Jeff Bezos - 19 Trillion Crores Dollars
Bill Gates - 12.5 Trillion Crores Dollars
Mark Zuckerberg - 11.97 Trillion Crores Dollars

and many moreeee....

These guys can buy 20% Of Bitcoin Market Supply if they want and don't comeback with stupid comeback like it will be a bad wealth decision they are smart they won't do that or anything like that, be practical even I love and support bitcoin but just please sit back and think.

and I agree with the fact that it has properties that the traditional banking system lacks of, but what about the other economic problems it is creating please just the read my above message in which I have replied to someone you will understand what I am trying to say.