Quote from: stompix on Today at 03:20:19 PM

Quote from: raymaot on Today at 03:04:33 PM

If you (as a bad issuer) decide to waste your money, absolutely you can do it and you can harm The related creditors maximum 20,000 Satoshi in each transaction as well. In this case no one will cover creditors lost. But how many of these crazy guys exist?

So you have no way of actually protecting your "customers" other than the faith of others not wanting to attack your protocol.

Also, you have not covered out the possibility of people using an accelerator in case of higher fees.
The next block confirmation fee is 50sat, the attacker uses a 20sat/b fee your protocol outbids it with 21 sat/b but the attacker uses an accelerator and gets the lower fee tx confirmed before our although higher has a chance of getting naturally confirmed.

There are multiple ways of cheating this outbid defense system it will simply turn out to be way too costly to keep it up. Why do you think nobody accepts zero-confirmation transactions? You're underestimating human nature, if it pays even a few cents per contract, someone would build a bot that that would wreak havoc on your system.

Quote from: raymaot on Today at 03:04:33 PM

The Sabu protocol is the most decentralized system ever. Please study "The network architecture" in article.

Nope, it's not!

Quote

The doc-watcher clients are running by different businesses and/or privates.

Besides, you're relying on centralized services such as email servers, for broadcasting contracts so, who is going to pay for all of this?

Quote

So you have no way of actually protecting your "customers" other than the faith of others not wanting to attack your protocol.

It has nothing with faith. It is exactly a cost benefit equation, while in the world there are both rational and irrationals, we are all agree rationals are far more than irrationals, and if some irrationals wants to hurt other in cost of their money no one can stop them, until they ran out of money. These attacks will be system costs and will be very small comparing system benefits.

Quote

Why do you think nobody accepts zero-confirmation transactions? You're underestimating human nature, if it pays even a few cents per contract, someone would build a bot that that would wreak havoc on your system.

You are right, they are few businesses that accept zero confirm transactions already. In fact they will switch to use Sabu transactions instead of classic Bitcoin transaction. The use of Sabu will be more beneficial, flexible and reliable for them.

Quote

Besides, you're relying on centralized services such as email servers, for broadcasting contracts so, who is going to pay for all of this?

As I told before, there is no central server (except google play or apple store to download the mobile wallet) at all. So every one pay her/his part. If you need a good email service, pay for it, or just use free services. Doc-watcher is a light client(like torrent) which has no cost except a low internet bandwidth, and Bitcoin full-nodes and mining pools already existed.
The system is highly decentralized. Please study architecture carefully.