Quote from: franky1 on Today at 05:37:09 AM

from a "scientific knowledge" / "computer science". your chosen category. its about precise terminology.
which would be ledgers.
heck no one minds if you try to ELI-5(explain like im 5) it into simple words.
but try not to flip flop and call it something else in another topic. but using the same technical prospective

otherwise all your posts just get ignored because you are just changing your own narrative at a whim.

computer science:
a database is too simple of a word to express scientifically what occurs in bitcoin. especially when it does not encapsulate the actual facility and function of the data

for instance the UTXO set. is a database. but the blockchain is a ledger.
the storage and editing/appending methods are completely different to each other

you cant edit the blockchain. hense not a database.
the lock and append and relational flow to new block is the special element that makes it a ledger and not a database

..
its ok to have separate versions of ELI-5 ELI-15 ELI-CS(compscientist) ELI-E(economist)
but to have 2 versions of ELI-CS calling it 2 different things. is where you went wrong

Thank you for pointing out the problems in my article, and I am trying my best to understand the suggestions you gave me. I am also trying to adapt to the rules and culture of this forum. Bitcoin is an independent database that may not be able to reflect the essential attributes of Bitcoin, and Bitcoin as a distributed database may reflect the characteristics of Bitcoin. I am writing these articles to explain my understanding of Bitcoin from different disciplines and different angles. I list these views separately because each article has its own unique logic. All have different causal relationships, so that people with different cognitive foundations can absorb this knowledge from different angles. Of course, there may be only a few people who have read them all patiently.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 05:45:28 AM

Quote from: RainbowKun on Today at 05:20:52 AM

You may feel that my article is meaningless, but I feel that my thinking is very valuable.

I didn't think or say any of these, all I'm saying is that you could have expressed your thoughts in a much shorter way. All you have said in the past 4 to 6 topics you have created could have been compressed into a single paragraph or two instead.

Thank you again for your suggestions, thank you very much,and I will further elaborate on my understanding. As you said, I can put the first four or five themes into one or two paragraphs, it will be very easy. So why do I use about 1,000 words or more in every article to explain my point of view? Writing so many words will consume a lot of time, energy, patience and perseverance. This is also a very big challenge for me. There are two main reasons for this. First, I think Bitcoin is a very great thing. It will represent a new civilization and it will transform all aspects of our human society. Most of the discussions on Bitcoin on the forum are currently limited to technical fields and currency applications. I rarely see deeper thinking and discussions. So I hope to explain my understanding of Bitcoin from different disciplines and fields. I hope to inspire more people through these articles of mine. The second point is that I need to record the process of my thinking and write down the logical relationships involved in each point of view. Just writing some conclusive text will be very simple. However, many people are not clear about the process of reaching this conclusion. How did you come to this conclusion? Why can you come to this conclusion? This is why I use a lot of words to describe the thinking process of each conclusion. I hope to inspire more people to think deeply with me. At the same time, I can also obtain more valuable information after your replies to further improve my knowledge system. Also, although I have used a lot of articles to illustrate my point of view. But if everyone reads each article carefully, you will find that the content of each article is different. Each piece of content has its own unique logical relationship and a corresponding reasoning relationship. These are more my philosophical reflections. There is still a certain difference between philosophical thinking and technical thinking. Technical thinking is more rational thinking, and every sentence must be very rigorous. Philosophical thinking is more open, and there is no standard answer.

Quote from: tranthidung on Today at 05:50:38 AM

The biggest attributed contribution of Bitcoin is Being a game-changer and changes the world.

Without Bitcoin appearance in 2009 and its contribution, we might not have the crypto market as big as nowadays (of course, it's still smaller than other markets) and the blockchain technology would have yet appeared or have yet achieved what it has now.

For technical aspects, I think we can skip them here. Simply said, Bitcoin changed the world, from individual to governmental, national aspects.

Yes, Bitcoin has greatly changed our world. The fate of many of us has changed because of Bitcoin. I am also expounding my understanding of Bitcoin in different ways. I hope that more people can understand the changes to us from a higher perspective, thank you Satoshi Nakamoto.