Quote from: hugeblack on Today at 09:28:09 AM

Regardless of the extent of the wallet's development, it is a mistake to trust web wallets, especially since private keys are generated by servers that cannot know their content.

Hi, we understand your concerns. We fully acknowledge this issue and we have done everything short of making the wallet decentralized to mitigate this issue as much as possible, mostly by ensuring that all communication between the custodian and the user (wallet), is proveable to be fair. This basically entails that either the custodian can scam everyone, or no one, as scamming individual users can be proven at all times, or so is the idea at least.

Currently for a wallet with the features of moneypot (we use blind signatures to essentially let the user blend in his inputs between all the other users) not having full access over the users onchain inputs seems impossible to merge with these features.

Decentralization seems feasible, but not at this stage.

Quote

The development of the site is slow and some parts do not work, it gives a negative impression towards it, I advise you to stop the site and turn it into a beta version.

It seems you've reviewed our landing page. What exactly was not working? It should show everything properly now.

our wallet is located here if you wish to try that out as well:

Code:

https://wallet.moneypot.com

Quote

The comparison that appears on the first page (Why moneypot? See for yourself: moneypot Any Wallet)[1] indicates a lack of professionalism. I hope to remove it. interface looks attractive. The rest of the site is not working.

I'm not sure I understand what you think it lacks? It's meant to give a quick impression on how moneypot differs from your regular webwallet and showcase its unique features in comparison to, say, blockchain.com.

The testnet custodian is back online!