back then privkeys, had no value.
they were not important.
satoshi;s philosophy was if people lost their keys it made the coins left in circulation more scarce
he showed no desire, excitement or effort in hoarding. no mention of wanting/needing to accumulate. he preferred sharing coins for others to use for bug testing
as did others back then. making faucets to give coins away
hoarding/accumulating coin mindsets only begun in 2011
If it's the case why did Satoshi hoard over 1 million bitcoin? Those were mined before 2011.
This is one that was missed by the OP. The GB spelling is FAVOUR and the American version is FAVOR
It might be worth considering that Satoshi wasn't American or British, but something in-between e.g. Canadian?!
I favour the plan to monitor if the frequency of blocks received drops too slow. That covers a large range of possibilities.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=691.msg8922#msg8922Thanks. When I made the thread I didn't show every GB British English and international English because it would've taken a long time.
It's negligent if the team didn't find ways to move the bitcoin years after Satoshi's absence.
Negligent?
You're looking at it from 2021 eyes, not from 2009 eyes where bitcoin was practically valueless.
Until those addresses become available or identities proven, if ever, ascribing morality to why those are locked away is
impossible and not respective of what the individual(s) may have believed.
No one knows the reality and it's still a myth that the person called "Satoshi Nakamoto" is real, Japanese, etc. until now, all those stories are spreading on the internet but the reality is still hidden.
What you're saying is correct it's better keeping open minds. Limiting ourselves to stubborn thinking's wrong because Satoshi could've been a pseudonym for one person or a team.