Quote from: franky1 on July 25, 2021, 03:17:27 AM

back then privkeys, had no value.
they were not important.
satoshi;s philosophy was if people lost their keys it made the coins left in circulation more scarce

he showed no desire, excitement or effort in hoarding. no mention of wanting/needing to accumulate. he preferred sharing coins for others to use for bug testing

as did others back then. making faucets to give coins away

hoarding/accumulating coin mindsets only begun in 2011

If it's the case why did Satoshi hoard over 1 million bitcoin? Those were mined before 2011.

Quote from: WePiggy on July 25, 2021, 01:43:33 PM

This is one that was missed by the OP. The GB spelling is FAVOUR and the American version is FAVOR

It might be worth considering that Satoshi wasn't American or British, but something in-between e.g. Canadian?!

Quote from: satoshi on August 12, 2010, 09:34:44 PM

I favour the plan to monitor if the frequency of blocks received drops too slow. That covers a large range of possibilities.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=691.msg8922#msg8922

Thanks. When I made the thread I didn't show every GB British English and international English because it would've taken a long time.

Quote from: Gcrypto786 on July 26, 2021, 02:51:59 AM

Quote from: kaggie on July 25, 2021, 11:45:57 PM

Quote from: arabspaceship123 on July 25, 2021, 11:27:02 PM

It's negligent if the team didn't find ways to move the bitcoin years after Satoshi's absence.

Negligent?

You're looking at it from 2021 eyes, not from 2009 eyes where bitcoin was practically valueless.

Until those addresses become available or identities proven, if ever, ascribing morality to why those are locked away is
impossible and not respective of what the individual(s) may have believed.

No one knows the reality and it's still a myth that the person called "Satoshi Nakamoto" is real, Japanese, etc. until now, all those stories are spreading on the internet but the reality is still hidden.

What you're saying is correct it's better keeping open minds. Limiting ourselves to stubborn thinking's wrong because Satoshi could've been a pseudonym for one person or a team.