Re: Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.
⭐ Merited by RainbowKun (1)
I am now working hard to improve my English level, as much as possible so that the thought of the article is not lost in the process of translation.
You're doing fine...Quote
Thank you very much kaggie for raising these questions. I will summarize and reply to these questions raised by kaggie. In fact, many answers have been included in my previous articles. For more details, please see my first article published on July 1: Bitcoin is not just a currency, but represents a new human civilization.
Hahah, oh, I get my own reservation now. I think I turned off immediately because of that post, and it's largely because there are users here every few days
claiming to be some famous figure (like being Satoshi, having a decade old hard drive with bitcoin, or this guy https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5352028.msg57581914#msg57581914 ), along with all of the new accounts that are created to sell something.
Your post above was also a bit over the top optimistic... even though I would agree.
So, in that context, I immediately turned off. (Not that I'm anybody.)
And perhaps, there was a little bit of jealousy because I agree too much, and thought of writing related things myself.
I find that you use key words, terms and concepts that are discussed briefly in your articles and are not in many other places, so these could also be themes of new posts to provide more background.
Good luck with your DAO and DeFi projects.
The question itself is not to discuss the quality of RainbowKUN’s posts, but to discuss whether the forum requires in-depth knowledge through this matter.
It seems like it can only help?People are discussing on the threads, which is a good sign.
There are probably more kinds of styles possible, but it seems successful as is.