Quote from: The Pharmacist on August 03, 2021, 10:41:07 AM

Quote from: RainbowKun on August 02, 2021, 02:54:45 AM

Thank you for your sincere advice, my good friend. I also found this problem. My articles have too many words, which caused many friends to have no patience to finish reading these words.

That may or not be the problem (too many words). I created a thread not too long ago in which I described my experience spending bitcoin at a place that had never accepted it before. A few members commented on the length of the OP, so I'm assuming that might be part of your "problem".

However, I would suggest that instead of writing less that you break up your text so that it doesn't look like a word-brick. People are much less likely to read your entire post if you don't have some empty space in between long strings of sentences, and I can tell you that personally I don't even have the patience for posts that are just BWoT's.

In the case of your OP in this thread....even though you used line breaks, it's all over the place in terms of content. You'd be better off making a concise post that boils down the main points you want to make without all the extraneous stuff. People don't (and won't) read a stream-of-consciousness type of post that doesn't get to the point within the first paragraph. You've got a lot of good stuff to say and write well, but this forum isn't for literary enthusiasts; it's for bitcoiners who probably have short attention spans (like me).

Good luck, and I wish you the best.

Hello Pharmacist, thank you for your kind suggestions. Recently, many friends have made similar suggestions to me. Nowadays, it is difficult for readers to have the patience to read too much text. Most of them will skip it directly when they see the text wall. I am also trying to shorten what I have written as much as possible, but I need them to maintain a complete logic. I write an article now, not only to give a conclusion, but more importantly, to record the process of my thinking and why I came to this conclusion. So there is a lot to write down. In the follow-up, I will try my best to improve my typesetting ability and improve readability.

Quote from: kaggie on August 03, 2021, 11:37:47 AM

Quote from: RainbowKun on July 22, 2021, 09:02:41 AM

Matters can not be created or removed. The survival and downfall of all things is merely the transformation of different matter forms.

e=mc^2
Matter and energy can be converted.

Quote

An atom is the smallest unit of ordinary matter that forms a chemical element. Every atom is composed of a nucleus and one or more electrons bound to the nucleus.

A hydrogen atom need not have one electron.

Quote

Humans can only divide or merge gold, which is the uniqueness and non-replicability of matter.

Gold can also be created
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_precious_metals

Quote

In my opinion, the most important basic characteristic of matters is "uniqueness" or "non-reproducibility". After a thing has this characteristic, we can call it "matter".

Matter can be divided by distinguishable and indistinguishable particles.
A pool of electrons can normally be separated by where they are located in an atom (their shell) or their magnetic properties (their spin).
A pool of neutrons in a nucleus may be indistinguishable from each other.

Quote

What is the relationship between chemical elements and Bitcoin? After thinking about Bitcoin, we found that Bitcoin also has the basic properties of matter, uniqueness and non-reproducibility. We can understand that in the digital bit civilization, Bitcoin is a kind of matter, which has the basic properties of matter. It also obeys the physical laws of the world.
...
The biggest feature of information is that it can be copied, and there is almost no cost. When information can be copied infinitely, they lose their unique value.

Bitcoin has both properties. It has replicable and irreplicable information.
The blockchain can be copied and verified. Previous transactions can be verified by an independent observer. It is replicable.
But the keys that sign these transactions are nearly impossible (as far as we know) to replicate, so that is irreplicable.

So, much like the dualities that exist in physics, bitcoin has dualities of replicability for external observers and irreplicability for guessing keys and performing on used transactions.

Hello kaggie, thank you for your wonderful reply. Your interpretation made my text more perfect, thank you. I am a liberal arts student, and I use perceptual language to describe my ideas. In many cases, it is not as rigorous as science students. In the future writing and research process, I will continue to improve the rigor of my writing logic. Let these words withstand more tests.

Quote from: davis196 on August 03, 2021, 12:07:46 PM

OP,you should try to win a Nobel prize in Physics or Economy with this theory.Maybe both...
Now why don't you embed Bitcoin in a game theory or try to explain how the universe was created by the power or Bitcoin? Grin

I'm being sarcastic...
Bitcoin/blockchain exists as a system,which is based on rules,trust and consensus.Some people are mining BTC,other people are buying BTC,some people spend their BTC,other people are HODLing BTC.
All those people are the main reason why Bitcoin has value.
They trust the system and have accepted the rules of the protocol.
Everything else seems like an over complication of the nature of Bitcoin.
Just go ahead and create an over complicated,hard to understand theory about Bitcoin.I don't mind. Grin

Haha,davis196 ,thank you for your kind joke. As you said, I have explained Bitcoin with game theory. It also interprets Bitcoin from the knowledge of different disciplines. Some theories may seem very complicated, or they may feel ridiculous. But I still think they are valuable. In my opinion, Bitcoin is definitely not just a technology, or a currency. He is a new kind of human civilization. I have always interpreted Bitcoin from the perspective of human civilization. This involves knowledge of different disciplines. Maybe my interpretation is not correct, but I am brave enough to write them out, so that more friends who are really interested in Bitcoin can participate in the discussion. I think this is valuable for humans' deep understanding of Bitcoin.

Quote from: marilynmanson21 on August 03, 2021, 12:32:54 PM

your article is too long, if you make a conclusion maybe I will understand what you mean,
but I will try to comment hopefully it doesn't go out of its direction and purpose

Do you think Bitcoin has matter property?
of course have where the miners must have a PC and the tools so as to produce bitcoin,
and in my opinion material is the selling value of an object where the object has value and bitcoin has value, so bitcoin can be said to be a moving object because the price it has is not the same every minute.
I hope I'm not wrong in responding to your article

Hello, marilynmanson21, thank you for your wonderful answer. You are one of the few who can fully understand my article. Your answer is more concise than mine, and you fully understand what I want to express. I am really very happy. The reason why I used such a long text to explain the conclusion I came to is because most people have difficulty really understanding what I want to describe. So I must write down the process of how to reach this conclusion. So that more friends can think deeply. Through your answers, we can find that the conclusion is the same, but the method of explanation can be diversified. Thank you again, my good friend.