Quote from: Pmalek on Today at 06:35:57 PM

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 11:18:51 AM

More likely: they got free advertising, they'll never pay, and some still wear the signature until now.

Actually, it turns out that they did get paid, but I understand your point and it could have easily gone the other way. It wouldn't be the first time that someone scams signature campaign participants.

These transaction IDs were posted by their admin:
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/142fb82c5351dc97c84b073990108f03e2f932951dcb3686054e4bac81c884b5
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/499115b1e095c38a137a76759945979e12a63244958fbc22bc5a9dddd7e17cf9

I compared some random addresses in the spreadsheet to the blockchain info real quick and it seems correct.

No reason why they would not, it's not a lot of money and it lets them go back and say, "look we pay our people, wear our sig next time and get paid too"

And, that is part of the problem here. There is no repercussions for massive negative trust unless you are selling stuff, and even then if you agree to escrow will people care?
If the deal is good enough, and there is no negative trust saying that they stole money, people will trade. Not as many, but enough.

-Dave