Quote from: hatshepsut93 on August 18, 2021, 07:41:42 PM

Quote from: RainbowKun on August 18, 2021, 04:53:54 AM

Thank you hatshepsut93 for this question, thank you very much. Here I also express my opinion again. Yes, I made a lot of extraordinary claims, but there is not enough evidence to prove them. These are my personal opinions, beliefs and hopes. Here, I put forward more of my philosophical thinking rather than scientific conclusions. Philosophy and science are two completely different disciplines. Science requires strict evidence, inferences and conclusions. Philosophy is relatively more open. There is no unified answer and no right or wrong judgments. But I think these thoughts are still very valuable. I have always believed that Bitcoin is not only important to Bitcoin's technology, but more importantly, the ideas and culture behind Bitcoin. As I said earlier, decentralized thinking, equal and free thinking. I write these views more of an exploration of these ideas. Of course, someone must believe these ideas, someone must say that this is a fallacy, this is a joke. Each of us has our own cognitive system and judgment standards. We have also heard a famous saying: Every time human civilization progresses, it is the result of thought. These propositions that I put forward now are not only applicable to today, but also predictions for the development of human civilization in the next fifty years. I believe they will still be applicable fifty years later. I hope that in the next ten years, more and more people will reach a consensus on these views, and then build a bit civilization step by step.

Talking about influence of Bitcoin is not just philosophy, it's more of a social science so there's a burden of proving your claims in some way instead of just declaring them. Even in philosophy scholars try to make some logical arguments for their statements. You are simply postulating your opinions as facts and want us to accept them without questioning it. Meanwhile Satoshi said "don't trust, verify" and it can easily be used as Bitcoin's core value.

Yes, your summary is very good. Bitcoin is not only a philosophy, but also a social science. We must not only declare our claims, but also prove our claims in some way. I very much agree with this view of yours. I am also following this direction as you said. I have now written dozens of articles to explain my views. These are my in-depth thinking on Bitcoin and some of my predictions for the future of human civilization. This is the first step of my action. After I have published all the articles and opinions, I will start my second step. I will start an independent blockchain project to also verify these claims. I will build a whole set of ecosystems, to promote Bitcoin, and build a series of ecology around the idea of bit civilization. And hope that through continuous actions to promote the concept of Bitcoin, more and more people can reach a consensus on these concepts. In this way, it is really possible for us to build a new human civilization centered on Bitcoin thought. I don't want everyone to accept these views without questioning. I hope to improve these views with more friends in constant exchanges and collisions.