Quote from: chaser15 on Today at 02:04:08 AM

Quote from: Beparanf on Today at 12:38:00 AM

Quote from: chaser15 on Today at 12:10:18 AM

Quote from: rhomelmabini on September 04, 2021, 04:01:18 PM

I think this need to be moved on our local board to create more awareness there but it's relevant as well here, maybe make a new thread if this one isn't moved.

Yes, this thread should be in local because this is only specific for PH users.

It's been known already even before that using a custodial wallet for crypto-gambling is not recommended especially if there are terms about it.

Binance is the only top exchange I think that doesn't have any terms about gambling but use them with caution.

Coins.ph can be used by customer abroad. So this might be discussed here for foreign customer awareness. I have a friend in SG and Canada, They tell me that they are using coins.ph for payment with other foreign citizen out there.

Ref link: https://support.coins.ph/hc/en-us/articles/360000012161-Which-IDs-are-accepted-for-the-ID-verification-process-

I think 90% of citizens that use coins.ph outside the country as wallets don't use them for gambling. There are lots of wallets they can use with much more convenience in that country. Regardless, the point here is there should be an awareness in the local section.

If you did miss the post I have quoted, posting it also on local (or creating a thread there) will "create more awareness" specifically for PH gamblers as there's more chance that PH gamblers are just staying there. There are PH users that are not participating in any sections of the forums. They need more awareness as they used coins.ph more compare to people outside like your friends.

It's not about the question wherein customers abroad can use it or not or your friend can use it outside the country. I hope you get that.

I'm well aware on your quoted posted and I just want to point out that there's foreign user of that app too. Not here to argue but if you can bring a data supporting for your "90%" of foreign user is not using it for gambling purposes then this topic should be move.

You already mention this

Quote

It's been known already even before that using a custodial wallet for crypto-gambling is not recommended especially if there are terms about it.

So I think there's no harm if this topic was discussed here, Besides most the Filipino in PH section is well aware on this matter. It's for a general knowledge about this issue. Not gonna argue anymore and not replying on your future reply on my remark.