Quote from: kentt on March 19, 2014, 09:10:44 PM

Quote from: cypherdoc on March 19, 2014, 07:05:06 PM

Quote from: justusranvier on March 19, 2014, 05:44:37 PM

Quote from: etotheipi on March 19, 2014, 04:38:22 PM

0.91 is an improvement over 0.90 for sure. But we don't believe that it's a critical upgrade.

I'm eating lunch with altoz right now and he also says he's had problems with 0.90 that required him to delete the .armory directory.

I think you've got a lot of users who having problem but are just living with them instead of reporting them.

i have had zero problems with 0.90 (zero crashes) and that's after putting it thru heavy testing.

of course, my laptop has 16GB RAM with a huge HD in linux.

Heavy testing? Can you take 10 transactions like this? http://blockchain.info/tx/e3aea19a966d103c4520530f6a8f9486b03d4cbe46deeeb56c4e72730fe83f2f

I couldn't on any rig.

These are the typical transaction that we identified bring Armory to a crawl, we're building a test case to identify possible inefficiencies. Worst case scenario we'll have to overhaul that part.