Quote from: Imranbutt44 on Today at 11:12:47 AM

Quote from: Imranbutt44 on Today at 09:33:13 AM

Please see the chart of binance in SPOT and futures.
On closely seeing it, in spot the left wick is lower and while the recent right wick is upper which shows that bitcoin is bullish.
Many traders including me know that btc is bullish, so we placed the stop loss in futures trading just below the left wick or on the left wick level.

But look what binance did in futures, they made the right wick lower than the left wick, only to hunt the stop losses of millions of traders.

They are scammers Sad

Spot Trading Chart:

Future trading Chart

Check this before choosing binance Angry

I am going to cite you so that your charts can be shown, and yes, just like the comment from
crwth in your cited thread, you need to acknowledge that spot and future trading are different things/markets... so accordingly the charts are likely to be different... so perhaps you need to explain a wee bit moar better why there should be any concerns... most likely nothing to see here in terms of points that you are wanting to make beyond that "shit happens" in markets.. and not everything that does not match up with a kind of precision that you expect is "insider" "manipulation".. blah blah blah.. as you titled the matter as "manipulation" in your thread, and you have absolutely no evidence for your assertion beyond what seems to be just a "feeling."

Quote from: proudhon on Today at 12:38:01 PM

Dead cat bounce high is ~$53k. We now know that bitcoin will not go higher than $53k again - until it does.

I agree, at least after the above FTFY part that was put into place.

I actually believe that the resistance point is around $55k rather than $53k.. but sure we have already been to $53k within the past 2.5 weeks.. and so perhaps we would just be dickering around if we would be trying to suggest that there is any significant and material difference between $53k and $55k, so it is quite possible if the BTC price gets anywhere in the $53k to $55k arena it could fail to break up again, and that may well not be a bad thing.. but surely, once it does break above that range.. we are likely off to the races in terms of getting into noman's land and likely to pretty much go from $55k to $80k without too many troubles.. that's the sense that I am getting from what seems to be current BTC price pressures.. so yeah, whether it takes a couple of weeks to play out or maybe a couple of months still remains a matter of conjecture that I feel some lack of confidence in asserting before it actually happens (presuming that it will, sooner or later).

Quote from: Mugtaiya on Today at 01:20:19 PM

Quote from: serveria.com on Today at 12:49:13 PM

Quote from: eXPHorizon on Today at 08:06:03 AM

Making BTC as legal tender = Basicaly a president trying to Manipulate the Price Point into his Favor 😂. PRESIDENTIAL FUCKERY

El Salvadorians : Get that shit out of our Country 😂😂😂

Really? So what are u doing here? Why do you beg in BTC? Just write you need $150k urgently as simple as that. GTFO! Grin

That is why the price dumped so hard the exact same day..
By showing any government can swing the price on a whim for their own plan of manipulation.
Pure fuckery indeed.

Another troll/shill in denial of King Daddy’s power... and trying to frame BTC's price performance down into some kind of narrow incoherencies. I am sure that there are some dumb people who actually believe those kinds of simplified views of bitcoin, but if you really want to attempt to understand bitcoin's price performance better, you need to zoom out a wee bit and not get caught up upon short term noise and nonsensical explanations.

In other words, the actions of El Salvador are small potatoes in the whole scheme of things especially if you actually attempt to take into account some of the BIGGER ideas that are contained within currently valid longer term and BIG picture BTC price prediction models such as 1) stock to flow, 2) four-year fractal and 3) exponential s-curve adoption based on Metcalfe's principles and networking effects.