Quote from: Lucius on Today at 01:05:46 PM

Quote from: Charles-Tim on Today at 06:33:39 AM

But, you are not wrong, more hardware wallet are recommendable but people do recommended Trezor and Ledger Nano because they are the most used and most tested for vulnerabilities.

Unfortunately, there is no other manufacturer that has managed to impose itself as an adequate alternative to Ledger or Trezor if we take into account everything that happened to Ledger, but also the irreparable vulnerability that was discovered on Trezor. This shows us that there are no serious players in the market, but only some who obviously do not have enough money or ideas to become somewhat relevant.

All this together benefits those who live from the old glory, and instead of achieving the highest possible quality and safety, they constantly run into new problems. I am of the opinion that people should be advised to consider buying hardware wallets, but they should not be explicitly suggested what exactly to buy.

There are certainly tons of tried and trusted alternatives today, just a few that come to mind are BitBox and ColdCard.

I agree, I prefer to give the resources and let the person decide on their own; no wallet is perfect and it comes down to personal preference what drawbacks are okay for you and what is unacceptable for you.