I'm sure you saw my proof in their topic since you posted a few posts below it, but here, in case you missed it, I'll quote it again.
Sure, I saw your post because I also replied to it there.
As I wrote earlier, I do not really understand how this can prove that they are definitely websites belonging to one company.
Maybe you can look into it. If you have any other explanation, I'll be happy to hear it.
The statements that are here are probably also based only on this. I have not found anywhere evidence that these companies have anything in common (apart from guesses and a similar names).
If you could link to a website where there is evidence that both of these companies are owned by the same owner, then I'll admit I'm wrong.
If you could link to a website where there is evidence that both of these companies are owned by the same owner, then I'll admit I'm wrong.
So you ask for evidence, I provide it to you, and you ignore the evidence because you "don't understand it" and keep claiming there is no evidence?