It would be quite a lot of work for the moderators to individually collate ban messages with the reason for it and I feel it would not have an impact as users would still create appeal threads and claim to not know the reason or when it was done.
The common reason is plagiarism or spamming which is included in the message, yet there are still tons of complaints.
The admin also posted this sometimes back;
For autobans, sure but manual ones should be concise. After all, it's could a single-liner like "Plagiarism" or if multiple, "Plagiarism + Malware spam". so it doesn't take an essay before banning.
Are not cases when a user is banned for plagiarism displayed as "Autobanned"?
Or am I misunderstanding something?
Usually, if an account is banned for spam, its account is not shown as Autobanned, meaning that the user himself can understand that this is a temporary ban. Isn't it?
And all other cases I see in bpip.org as an Autobanned.