Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Now you sound like a BIG blocker nutjob who is selectively nitpicking the contents of my post and coming to garbage and selective interpretations.
Effectively you are the one to downgrade this conversation, by insulting me in a way I didn’t think possible. Big blocker? Me? In other words, fuck you Jay.
In other words, you are showing yourself as an emotionally sensitive twat.
There might have been a more substantive point to re-iterate, but losing track of the substantive point beyond you and a few other nutjobs spouting out overweighted nonsense that the BTC price follows hashrate - as if hashrate were some kind of central consideration... and blah blah blah regarding anti-lightning network (and anti-second layer) nonsense that generally attempts to suggest that all solutions have to be "on-the-first-layer." Don't those dumbass arguments sound familiar? One of the lovely things about segregated witness (have you heard of it) remains that it facilitates a lot of second layer (centralized or whatever who fucking cares?... you can use them if you want or you do not have to), while hardly at all putting any kind of jeopardy or security issues to undermine the first layer....
Have you ever considered that further down the layer solutions can be built upon decentralization, but if you try to accomplish that the other way around, you are engaging in smoke and mirrors - like many shitcoins play those kinds of games.. in other words, you can build centralized systems upon decentralized systems and maintain centralization, but not the other way around.. so in that respect, you go fuck your dumb little BIG blocker wannabe self (even if you don't realize it), Cryptotourist.
I have been attempting to be descriptive of what is going on in terms of both 1st layer and 2nd layer, and I don't feel any need to argue my points beyond my already having had sufficiently made them.
Do you look in the mirror, when you type your replies? How is it that you miss the point - when you don’t agree with something?
You had a point? Oh? I had not realized that part.
If you believe that there is something wrong with bitcoin or its current trajectory that includes lightning developments and other second layer solutions, including its combination of solutions then you likely have some kind of burden to point that out.
I didn’t say that, in fact, READ again what I said, then use WRITE to complete the process.
Lookie uie poo-ie. Giving assignments.
I was just pointing to your assertion that seemed to be suggesting that lightning might not be adding value and to assert that from my perspective, I see some value happening through some of those mechanisms.. lightning, liquid and perhaps some other ongoing bitcoin and bitcoin-related happenings.
We need something easy to work with, decentralized and censor-less if this is going to succeed en masse.
We have bitcoin. Have you heard of it? It goes by other names, too - such as king daddy, honey badger, lilie fiend and a few other names.
You might have to explain more, for whatever that is worth.
I will, promise, when I’m ready. I’ve had an idea for a couple of years, brewing and maturing, and I’m almost ready to share it.
Oh gawd..
does it involve a coin?