Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 11:29:10 AM

Quote from: JollyGood on Today at 11:10:18 AM

Could the RapTarX account have left the negative trust as theatrics as a way to try to save at least one account while knowing the other could be saved by playing ignorant? Rather than admit the slip-up and lose two accounts would it not be better for a puppeteer to try to save at least one while still hoping that two can be saved? That is another possibility.

That's possible. But it's also possible RapTarX doesn't have anything to do with it.
Let me put it this way: if someone says they're me, I can't help it, but that doesn't mean anyone should believe them.

I agree, if someone claims to be say for example LoyceV and posts as such, that should not mean the onus is on LoyceV to prove that he is not connected to one who posted under the guise by deliberate sabotage or accidental slip-up. At the same time the reaction of LoyceV would count for something too.

In this case, RapTarX did not exactly react in a way that gives me confidence either but then again I do not know him, never interacted with him other a couple of PMs and posts a couple of days ago therefore do not know his personality. Hopefully RapTarX can post too just to say with retrospect if it was it a good idea for him to say:

"Lol, who would've thought someone else is applying with my information. Funnily enough; made my day.
Can I know what's going on @Little Mouse"

It would not have made my day and I would not have found it funny either. On the contrary, I would be furious that someone has deliberately or accidentally posted claiming to be me and that now I could be stuck with a red tag accused of being an alt-account or part of a farming account. That still does not negate from the fact that RapTarX cannot be accused of wrongdoing, the onus is on Little Mouse to explain why he did what he did.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5199919.msg53255473#msg53255473
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5199919.msg53254782#msg53254782

Quote from: Little Mouse on Today at 11:45:36 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 10:00:30 AM

Why don't you just share what you sent my by PM (September 26, 2021, 12:34:01 PM Amsterdam time)?

LoyceV, I said you I will post it in public. It took me days to finally decide.
I will post that today along with an explanation to other thread. I'm little busy at the moment with some personal work in real life. I will try to post tonight but if I can't, I will post by this Friday.

You sent me a PM just a couple of hours ago saying you did not feel comfortable to explain either in private or in public and you would not do it. What changed?

If you it took you days to decide that you will post and explain everything but you told me just a couple of hours ago you would not post and not explain and not share what you shared with Loyce - then there must be titanic struggle going on inside you.

You sent a PM just a couple of hours ago saying that everything was crystal clear and you had nothing to explain but now you post to say you will provide an explanation - so what has changed and why the need to explain now even though said everything is crystal clear? Certainly looking forward to reading your explanation by Friday at the latest.

Thank you for letting us know you will provide an explanation.