Quote from: Betwrong on Today at 01:11:05 PM

Yeah, really? And what is this "simple arithmetic", in your opinion?

Is this not simple enough for you?

Quote from: https://theconversation.com/at-my-hospital-over-95-of-covid-19-patients-share-one-thing-in-common-theyre-unvaccinated-166708

At my hospital, over 95% of COVID-19 patients share one thing in common: They’re unvaccinated

I'll tell you a little secret about how they cook the numbers. 'vaccinated' is not equal to 'injected' in their diffinition, but they won't tell you that. If a person is 'injected' in Jan 1, they won't be 'vaccinated' until mid Feb because it doesn't start until 14 days after the second inject (for multi-dose gene therapies.) Then 2.5 months later you are back to being 'unvaccinated' again. At least by some definitions which the propagandists are prone to use when writing fodder like the above for audiances like you. That's about 2.5 months.

Note also that in spite of 'theconversation.com' going on about 'journalistic integrity', they cannot even figure out how to put a date on the story. This is important for reasons associated with another common scam: Writing a story about the 'unvaxxed' dying, but not mentioning that the time window was before the gene therapy injections were rolled out in a big way so very few people even could be 'vaxxed'.

Quote from: Betwrong on Today at 01:11:05 PM

Or this?

That's just a graphic with zero information, including the date we just talked about. what a joke.

Quote from: Betwrong on Today at 01:11:05 PM

Or this?

Quote from: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58545548

Fully vaccinated people are much less likely to die with Covid-19 than those who aren't

Here's another scam you should know about. If an uninjected person dies of just about anything, it gets counted as 'covid'. If an injected person dies from the jab, they count it as something else, or as 'covid' if they need more numbers. Just depends on what story they would like to paint. One think it will never be labeled as is a 'adverse reaction to the gene therapy.'

The same game is easily played with hospitalizations. In short, the books are so obviously cooked that mainstream media stories, public health data, celebrity doctor proclaimations which will be directed to come up in your social media feed, etc, are completely useless even if one does know the tricks they use.

Quote from: Betwrong on Today at 01:11:05 PM

You know, this is serious. Someone might read your antivaxxer bs and die because of believing it. Be careful with what you are saying, when many people can potentially read it.

You also should be careful because it cuts both ways. You will find out that you 'bet wrong' on this one I'm afaid.

I know exactly zero people who died of 'covid-19', and nobody who has been terribly sick for the last year or so. I have direct first or second degree information on around 20 people who have died within a week of getting the jab and were progressively sicker and sicker from the needle until their death. About 70% of these were in rural areas in a 'developing world' country where I live, and the other 30% were in larger cities. I had to loan money for funeral expenses to a friend who lost three of her mother's siblings at the same time and within a week of the jab. That occurred in a larger urban area.

Again, all of these people will have been logged as 'unvaccinated' due to the timings of their injections and their deaths.