Quote from: Yamifoud on October 07, 2021, 10:55:27 PM

And besides, they don't have similar market applications and use-case believing that they don't have the same results. Honestly, ICO had made them more profitable, many of them have gone so fast and become shit projects but at least people are also having a good experience.

When the ICO craze first started, there were a few good projects but the one that came after that and milked on the hype were worthless because they were only meant to be moneygrabs when they started.

Same happened with NFTs. They should have been kept to the state of artworks and all and not old twitter posts and things that are having no significance and only because of someone's influence gain a value because they will not last long.

Quote

But these NFT's coins, it is somewhat people get worried about them, they don't look so attractive and promising makes investors not to choose and doubtful for investing. Anyways, ICO had done already but has come possible that the NFT projects will follow shortly.

Does this not carry all the red flag signs of being a worthless project in future? Long term value of the ICOs became nil as people flocked in and similarly the NFT market will also show signs of depreciation and then the newbies who jumped on the hype-train will learn their lesson.

Quote from: DOH! on October 07, 2021, 11:46:15 PM

I think, Because of its attractiveness and abstraction. The value of the NFT is always on alert and therefore quick liquidity will be an important vertical factor. NFT is a ready-made work so ICO is not suitable for that, instead even new projects related to NFT launch on IDO.

In case you started after the ICO craze happened you might be getting this idea. I would beg to differ having seen both the ICO and DeFI hypes followed by the NFT hype.

All that attractiveness and BS is only temporary. It is not like gold that has long term value. When ICO first came in, people were crazy to buy loads of it and today those coins are -1000% or even less.