Quote from: dCombat on October 09, 2021, 09:53:08 PM

Quote from: Miiike on October 09, 2021, 11:14:14 AM

The problem here is not what you write (or didn't write), what I read, and what people interpret. Your situation here is offering a business proposal and asking people to invest, in you. It will only be fair if they're given as much and as clear information as they need to help them decide, not an ambiguous and free-to-interpret answer.

If people are about to invest in a project (be it me or any other people) they should have an access to a clear and honest information of how prospective the project is. And on this specific matter, how likely will the project ends up in binance like you claim you will be. So I do really hope you can understand the situation where I, you, and everybody else sat and gave an answer that could leave as small as possible room for interpretation.

The question is very simple, and a short yes or no will give a lot of people helps in their decision, if you really want to be fair: have you been in contact with binance to discuss the listing?

The problem here is that no answer is sufficient for you. Judging by most of your posts on this forum you obviously have no interest in any of these projects other than nitpicking, which is not very constructive for anyone involved. As a friendly gesture I would still like to invite you to our upcoming campaign this month, join our newsletter at https://dcombat.zone

Wow, what's wrong with,

Quote from: dCombat on October 08, 2021, 11:58:27 AM

Active discussions are the lifeblood of any community such as the crypto world.

Now you decide you don't want an active discussion with me and decide to give a gesture to dismiss my question? Or perhaps I read them from a wrong perspective? But sure, I'll bite. First, to clarify my status and position:

If you read my post history on this forum, then you'll also figured out that on those threads I attend and... asks in details, either the dev team finally gave up by stopped replying, suddenly cease from existence in the crypto world and abandoning their thread because I ask the question that obliterate their scam attempt, or they're legit and I stopped asking because they gave an adequate information and I think from that point anyone interested on investing can use the materials gathered from the questioning session as part of their DD.

For example, this project, which sounds very confident at first, ready for their token sale, turning rather aggressive when I ask details of their tokenomy, and then poofff... gone. On the other side, this project seems rather legit (note that I didn't promote them by any means by saying this) they're backed by a company that's checked, they didn't care how much raised by the ICO, so I leave them alone.

And of course, in my very subjective opinion, I don't think my questions can be considered as nitpicking. Nitpick is the action associated with asking tiny, useless, and unimportant details. Perhaps something like a typo in a website, or a grammatical error, which (as far as I remember) I have never even bother to ask. I prefer the words scrutinizing if we have to put a label on my actions. I inspect closely.

As an example, I think digging for some details on this project (a little out of topic, I was in touch with the CEO and waited for his feedback on the matter) kinda prove some degree of effort taken to investigate, uhh... I mean scrutinize a project.

Unless, of course, if you consider the information about your deal with binance is insignificant and unimportant. If that's the case, then yes, I think it's rather acceptable if you deem my question as nitpicky, as the description matched.

Next, I would have to beg to differ on the term of being constructive as I think it's rather subjective. To whom does it non-constructive? To readers who intend to invest, the information is rather beneficial to gain information. To a legit project developer who has nothing to hide, the exchange of conversation helps them explaining their project and give details that might be missed. For a project that is rather questionable and didn't want their stack of lies, scam project, and the likes, well then yes, I think I'm rather pesky from their perspective. Like what the bad guys in scooby doo said, "I would have gotten away with it, if it weren't for you meddling kids!" But to be fair, up to this point, I don't think you're trying to scam. Benefits of the doubt, of course.

Finally, the question is easy. You keep avoiding a direct answer is what makes this discussion lengthy and unnecessary, which raises more suspicion. So, please allow me to change my question and add just a tad bit of security measure, which I think kinda acceptable to be asked and... scrutinized over, given your statement:

Quote from: dCombat on September 29, 2021, 05:41:58 PM

Like you, we don't like dirty marketing and it's critical that all token holders know exactly where and how they can use their tokens.

"Have you been in discussion with binance for listing (if so, please share us a screenshot of conversation or ticket submission proof, or anything to back up the claim you so determined to keep ambiguous, censoring important details, of course)? Or was the statement wrong, and factually there is no effort and measurements taken to be listed on binance other than planning and discussing them internally?"

If... I may suggest, if the answer is "no, we haven't," I would urge you to say "sorry, it's just a planning phase and we misworded our sentence". You'll lose some face, but I'm sure you can gain it back if you perform nicely, and certainly it'll save you from unnecessary further embarrassment. Like you, I really like to move forward from this topic into another cases