Quote from: zSprawl on March 21, 2014, 04:40:01 AM

Quote from: comeonalready on March 21, 2014, 03:39:56 AM

You oversimplified your example to the point of eliminating units of representation thereby eliminating the possibility of being able to see how the the time scale units could be combined and factored. But I understand your position... You want to be right even if you're not correct.

I do often wonder about your kind. Well played with the grammar mistake, all the same.

I find it to be absolutely amazing that you believe your oversimplification was equivalent to the expression I put forward. And that you are unable or unwilling to reexamine your assertion in light of a new realization that the two time scales can be combined and factored. But don't take my word for it. Ask someone else who you consider to be as smart as or smarter than you. Either way, I won't expect to hear back from you as your ego may not allow you to pursue any activity which could possibly prove you wrong.

In case you really need to simplify things in order to understand them, if you were to set your miner to generate hashes at the rate of 1MH/s, what is the total number of hashes it will generate in 86400 seconds? Don't answer this; it's rhetorical. The answer should be instantly obvious to all.

I only chose to highlight your grammatical error in order to point out that there are indeed details which escape your notice, even when they are staring you in the face. I am not now, nor have I ever been an agent of the grammar police.