Quote from: flounderella on March 21, 2014, 03:58:46 AM

Quote from: jjj0923 on March 20, 2014, 08:13:25 PM

Quote

Okay, thanks.
So the question still remains. Is it advantageous to do it that way or to have each miner reporting separately to the pool to there be added up and tallied?
I mean, is it more profitable to combine total hash rates etc. at the origin point (local) or at the receipt point? Or does it matter at either way?
Does one method make more money than the other?
That's the point of this discussion, after all Wink
Wolfey2014

it's all going into the same wallet eventually so I don;t think there's any advantage to having a worked for each GS instance - unless you like to see the difference in has rates and it can be dramatic - I have 20 works set up for my 20 GS's and that has rates can run from 260 up to 415 sometimes.

"I noticed having one worker for all Gridseeds tends to raise the pool difficulty and then starts starving some GS, e.g. for DOGE. For lower difficulty coins/pools, they work just fine."

Now, that's the kind of information I'm looking for! That is definately important to know!
Thanks!
Wolfey2014