Quote from: CryptopreneurBrainboss on October 12, 2021, 08:13:10 AM

I don't know if he'll pay or not which is why I was of the opinion of giving him more time to login in first before decision were taken on tagging him. The tags doesn't make it any easier as he can decide not to pay now since even though he pays the tags would likely not be removed. Participants are been owned here for 10weeks and I was looking for a means of making it easier for them to get paid first before actions are taken.

This is the case that means she is looking for a reason not to pay campaign participants. This should not be a good reason for not paying, this is have nothing to do with the participant because participants are not tagging him or not taking any action. The tag has been given by DT members, just put a warning, so before joining users will be aware of his activities. There would happen any problem so Lightlord should explain the situation and payout. The red tag is removable, if he can show a reasonable reason, then obviously DT members would reconsider the red tag.

I have remembered a few days back regarding at scam allegation, I have sent PM to Lightlord about the allegation because it was looked legit to me. But I hadn't got any response from him even he was online, nor did anyone from his support team respond to the allegation. This isn't the right way to handle a campaign or allegation at all.

@CryptopreneurBrainboss, the community would ask as well to you why have you run a campaign for TEN weeks since Lightlord not paying? You can't ignore your responsibility as well. Hope you are trying your best to resolve the allegation about the participant's payments.