I feel like I have written this hundreds of times lately, but alright. Lets do it one more time.
You or TillKoeln, never wrote an official explanation about all this. instead, you have chosen to ignore everything or to sporadically get involved in an argument. it is certainly not a good solution.
You have to keep in mind, that someone to trust you and deposit their money in your service, now they haven't anything from there. And 20-30k Doge coins is not a worthless amount. so you don't show the slightest respect for someone's property, which he lost because he gave it to you to trust.
Since all this noise Unnamed goes through these days comes from a double spend attack that resulted in Unnamed users losing Doge, why would we let weak source codes get a low amount of confirmations if that only means users like bitmaster1 and his followers can do it again?
Doge is listed on probably all known exchanges. no one has such a problem, or at least has not complained. So this just indicates that you did not make your application well. it marks you as incompetent in this business, it’s probably best to get out of it all though.
And to the coin devs who refuse to listen and keep going with their bad diff retarget etc. I know some of you don't have a clue about the retarget function. What it means and what it does.
Others are aware, but don't know how to fix it.
if so, why do you accept them? you like to take their money for listing on your app, even if you know they are poorly created. offer a helping hand to projects that no serious service is trying to take into consideration. so it is your decision to deal with them, probably just to make some money from them.
don't you really see your mistake in that?
The repayment process is going slow but steady thanks to trading fees and withdrawal fees.
Some other solutions to make it go faster will be announced soon.
why not publish it now?
the aggrieved would like to know what to expect from you. try to put yourself in their position.
Also, can you give us any proof of what happens to the repayments? I mean about real repayments.
And DaveF (from the o-holy thread that i don't bother to comment in anymore)
You are correct. Getting Unnamed shut down would only result in users not getting anything back.
I understand that is a wet dream for someone out there, so feel free to go all in on it.
But that says more about you than anyone else. That you quote bitmaster says even more...
DaveF and every normal person do not like to see this kind of deception, and it has nothing to do with any dream. if you have harmed a large number of people, your business needs to stop working as soon as possible. you still haven't given us any reason to think otherwise.
I don't want to comment anything about bitmaster and whatever you have with them. I have seen many complain about you, even after your many promises that you have done much to question the security of your service. Check this post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5320917.msg58160452#msg58160452 where his problems arise from 18.9.2021. that’s a lot after you find out about all the flaws in your business. but obviously, you don't care.
What is your intentions in crypto? Support the scammers and destroy the ones with good intentions?
After all, can you really say that you both
you and TillKoeln have good intentions? really?
I really try to talk in a civilized manner, and here I hope that you two will give us something real that will convince us of your good intentions here.