Question for CryptopreneurBrainboss: Once the campaigns begin, can you post here how many people left because of the late payments? I don't expect many of them to have left, and in that case I assume they don't consider lightlord to be high risk.
High risk doesn't necessarily mean that it's not worth the risk for some. Granted the payouts are not large, but some users are getting bonuses, and some have nowhere else to go.
Would you join one of lightlord's campaigns?
By the way, in this regard and expanding on what I was saying before, I remembered that in a post I mentioned both of you. friends1980 wrote a long post in the signature campaign thread criticizing several participants for shitposters. The post was quite long and reasoned, and criticized the manager:
The sad truth is, this manager, as many other managers, couldn't care less about the posting quality of his participants...
I, believing him to be somewhat right, also responded to him in detail, among other things the following:
Brainboss has its standards regarding quality that need not be the same as yours. I have seen sometimes in the spreadsheet a note: "improve post quality" with which I understand that he has given a warning to the person in particular and if you go to page 135 of the spreadsheet you can see that Lewan was removed for low quality.
...
How would you manage a campaign that pays like $0,07 per post for the lowest tier? It is clear that LoyceV, suchmoon etc. will not apply for this campaign. You will have to try to get them to a certain quality, but you can't ask for much, and I think Brainboss is doing well.
When I was in the campaign, there was a minimum requirement to have earned 5 merits in the previous 120 days but since Lighlord lowered the rates, many participants left the campaign and the requirement changed:
No minimum merits, constructive/decent posts history required.
So, I don't think we can take the fact of whether or not the current participants leave the campaign as a reference for Lightlord's trust.