Would you join one of lightlord's campaigns?
No, I wouldn't join it (and even rejected managing the campaign because of the low payments for participants, which means I wouldn't be able to get quality posters). But if the campaign I'm in wouldn't pay for a week, I wouldn't leave either. And I can imagine that week could get longer and longer next time without leaving.
It is also possible that lightlord collects some kind of interest on people's money.
I highly doubt that.
Some would not be accepted in other campaigns, as they themselves admit:
That was (more or less) my point: the participants don't leave despite the late payments, they trust they'll get it eventually, and they have no other options anyway. Kinda sad though.
The 777coin and Bitvest.io campaigns have been accused several times of being full of shitposters. I wouldn't say as much, but it's clear that campaigns that pay 150 per post in the lowest tier are not going to be full of top quality posters.
Those signatures usually mean I don't consider the post worth reading.
I don't know if LoyceV is saying that we should change the feedbacks if people don't have left
That's up to you, I didn't tag him myself.
I have even requested to recreate thread, reduce members and make the campaign more productive
It's not entirely on you, at a certain pay rate you can only get certain quality.
You think you're better than them, the campaign has produced quite some high quality member that I'm pretty sure if the payment was on time they'll still be with us.
Did the high quality members leave for a campaign with a better pay rate?
So, I don't think we can take the fact of whether or not the current participants leave the campaign as a reference for Lightlord's trust.
In that case, assuming they're all just shitposters, getting rid of the campaign altogether would be better for the forum.