Do you know that from experience or do you just assume it should be like that? Inaccurate information that stimulates a completely illogical and unnecessary discussion is definitely something I report, but always with evidence that confirms it.
Most often, it is the description of "general or vague content" that categorizes most of the reports I have made.
It is undoubtedly trivial to create some thoughtless remark about the price of bitcoin, along the lines of, "the bitcoin price is volatile and [pad] no one really knows how to predict [pad]."
It is also commonplace to see any "agree and repeat" posts, merely paraphrasing the quoted response (usually of the same post quality).
And let us not forget the massive effort required to copy paste + source, or to list a couple crypto symbols as good investments in those "what's a good coin?" threads.