Quote from: dedizonesv2 on October 30, 2021, 08:48:27 AM

I've got the same result. The higher reported hashrate on the TBM then on the Gminer but much more shares on the Gminer.
3 days testing on 12x 1660S. 6 GPUs on the Gminer and 6 GPUs on the TBM.
Honestly, I've got to say the TBM lies about the hashrate similarly like the Phoenix miner does.
I'm back on Gminer at this moment.

I have the same observation as you ...

Gminer 2.70 - Kernel 4

33 x RTX 3070
Cc 1070 | Mc 2400 | P0 : 61.60Mhs

1 x 3080
Cc 1070 | Mc 2300 | P0 : 100.3Mhs

Total farm 4875w (on the wall) @ +/-2.133Ghs

----------------**

TBM 1.21 - Kernel 8 - intensity 224

33 x RTX 3070
Cc 1070 | Mc 2400 | P0 : 64.80Mhs

1 x 3080
Cc 1070 | Mc 2300 | P0 : 103.8Mhs

Total farm 4980w (on the wall) @ +/-2.203Ghs

-----------***

RED TBM Share !

Green Gminer Share

https://0bin.net/paste/VlP1g9SC#PSL3QHWAXHtIwAO+hqgkR7ib9av3k5sXrVCxlcPBBAY

-----------

the question is how one can have with such a low OC memory still 61MHS?

I had fun putting at 61 Mhs as for Gminer in order to have 2.133Ghs and the surprise
consumption only drops by 50W on all rigs? and the heated cards in the same way as at 2400Mhz !!

in reality that I drop from 2400Mhz to 1900Mhz the consumption is identical but as my cards run at 61Mhs I am at 650 / 720shares instead of 800/900

So I tested all the possible settings, I conclude either you are lying on hashrate in order to deceive the newbie because it judges only by the power instead of looking at the number of shares / hour.

I read all the pages, you play with stales and recommended pools that don't pay!

you say that 2% of stale is not serious because the pool pays! except that 2% solo is too much! then say to go on 2min because it is more profitable it is completely wrong ... especially with the stories of M.E.V and E.D.E.N network

You have just taken the sources of Ethemine with the ideas of lolminer (besides he released 192 in workload, you also recommended after 192 ??) .. Gminer and so on.

the miner is too complicated to set, we have no course of action you even do not know which setting to put

I'm sorry but when I take Gminer, lolminer or trex whether on 2miner or crazypool I don't need to spend 2 days finding the right setting for $ 0.20 more but which will actually end up in the business because your miner takes 100w more

So for me it will not be recommended at all to my community.

simplified the miner and really displayed what we mine and rule

[/quote]

I have come to the same conclusions.
There is something wrong on the hashrate shown on miner.
After several tests, comparing TBMiner with GMiner/T-rex/lolminer I found out that the submitted total shares submitted to the pool was more or less the same, despite the hashrates difference.
BUT, the power consumption (at wall) using TBM was much higher.
I don't know if most of you don't pay for electricity, but for me passing from 5,1KWh to 4,8KWh is a huge benefit on costs.
At the moment I consider this miner still immature, so for the moment I'm switching back to GMiner for Nvidia and lolminer for AMD, which work best on my hardware.
I'll give it another try in the future.