Quote from: apsvinet on March 22, 2014, 01:20:31 PM

Quote from: gourmet on March 22, 2014, 12:57:36 PM

Quote from: FalconFly on March 04, 2014, 10:54:27 PM

I'd vote for keeping things as they are...

I find is useful that poeple who mindlessly rent their sigs as spam openly demonstrate that they can be bought dirt cheap and have no principles or conscience.
It tells alot about someone who does that, thus I consider it useful info.

Yes. I think it's the simpliest soluiton that works. Anyone (including me) can decide to ignore them. :-))

And that's why the changes were nonsense. Just check the box that says "ignore other's signatures" and nobody gets bothered.

The problem with simply ignoring those people - including me - is that not all of us make bad posts or such. That is why I believe this move to be a step in the right direction.