Quote from: merockstar on March 22, 2014, 06:54:23 PM

Quote from: Din on March 22, 2014, 06:35:17 PM

Quote from: arandy on March 22, 2014, 06:30:21 PM

Quote from: Din on March 22, 2014, 05:02:26 PM

Quote from: arandy on March 22, 2014, 02:03:06 PM

I see that escrow is added which is good, only now i wonder how will the early investorst who took the risk without escrow be rewarded? Are there being made any differences? Or is fase 1 of the IPO closed already?

We're still talking about this, what's your opinion? I feel like blatantly rewarding direct investors would cause backlash about this "being a scam"

Maybe direct investors receive a 1.1/1.2 multiplier on top of no fees?

If anyone else would like to discuss this possibility feel free! Still early enough to make changes

Sounds OK to me but closing fase 1 as fast as possible sounds better ;-)
But I'm an early investor so that would be good for me so my word means shit in this. Grin

Haha, of course. We'll we're gonna continue thinking about what's best, hopefully more opinions come through.

Agreed. People who invested before escrow should have half the first stage split between them exclusively Tongue

Also Stage one should end now plz.

Lol.

Obviously, I'm biased too.

If direct investments pick up again (they've stagnated) we'll most definitely implement a 1.2-1.3x multiplier to earnings. We're not closing off stage 1 or splitting it up.