At the moment I play with small amounts and have not had any problems at all.
I now understand where the confusion comes from. You have experience with them as a low budget player, so you haven't encountered any issues. That's why you believe they aren't scammers. But you see, with most scam accusations, the problem arises when someone win large amounts. The practice of selective scamming is very common among scam casino operators. They will offer a small payout in order to attract players, but stop paying out any larger winnings.
If I had even provided evidence that I had withdrawn large sums, would you believe that it is correct? I'm sure I would have been accused straight away that it was fixed with 1xbit to prove that they are honest.
Don't assume anything. If you have this type of evidence, you should publish it. It will give your claims more credibility, whether people believe it or not. As you can see, having evidence from one side only is not good. 1xBIT doesn't provide any. This is why I am more inclined to believe accusers who attach screenshots and account IDs.
It seems you are creating the misunderstanding. The fact that I play with small amounts is one thing. Earlier, I wrote that 1xbit pays me regularly for being a participant in the signature campaign. If they have been paying me without problems for several months, it is obvious that I have a very positive opinion about 1xbit.