Quote from: PhantomPhreak on March 23, 2014, 01:17:33 AM

Quote from: zjtwohaha on March 23, 2014, 12:48:41 AM

Quote from: PhantomPhreak on March 23, 2014, 12:40:20 AM

Quote from: Luke-Jr on March 23, 2014, 12:29:16 AM

Quote from: led_lcd on March 23, 2014, 12:00:02 AM

Counterparty requirements
1) 80 bytes of data
2) Counterparty transactions are relayed through the network as normal transactions

Do you think it is possible to reach an agreement from your side on how we can achieve these requirements? If so can you think how this could be possible?

I don't think those requirements are reasonable.
Why does it matter how much data XCP can use, or how the transactions are relayed?
What should matter is that people can use it for A, B, and C goals.
The technical side is just a matter of implementation, not requirement.

We need at least 80 bytes because that's the limit the Counterparty protocol was designed around.

The solution you proposed is hackish and political, and needlessly so. We need a simple, robust and standard way of relaying our transactions through the normal and fully decentralised Bitcoin network. We need for our system to have as few points of failure as possible.

So don't u mean if bitcoin core devs insist on 40 bytes, XCP will be gradually dead?

No, not at all.

So what would happen to XCP if 40 bytes limit is imposed?