Craig Wright is ~ ~ ~ blablablaaa~ ~ ~
Nice! I suggest that you make your accusations in a court of law instead of hiding in the shadows of your internet connection like no balls.
But why waste time? BSv is like #60 shitcoin by market cap, meaning objectively time is better spent warning noobs about gambling on 55 more relevant shitcoins. On top of that, we all know that those coins are never moving, and i expect Faketoshi has already transferred all of his assets to Ayre. This way he's uncollectable and will just declare bankruptcy so Ira won't be able to get a penny.
Quote
Understand that bitcoin is not a ticker, it is a computer protocol.
You & your troll friends know that but you participate in fooling consumers into believing that BTC is legitimate, but BTC is not BSV, BSV is bitcoin, compare source codes, functions, attributes, white paper.
The white paper governs the bitcoin computer protocol .
No SegWit functions in the white paper, no LN; no replaceByFee, ChildPays4Parent, let alone Taproot, mixer functions, not present in the white paper.
Be brave & honest, be ethical, be humble, if you are really a bitcoin enthusiast, build, share your passion with beginners they deserve to have a compliant, solid, secure, stable & scalable tool such as BSV and its original Bitcoin protocol to work well and have access to infinite possibilities. Respecting satoshi, the creator of the software, respecting his work, is the least you can do as a former user I don't understand why you don't see all this (knowingly?)
Put down your lasers that blind you. It's about time!
Check, verify & wake up! https://coingeek.com/crypto-crime-cartel-behind-adam-back-and-blockstreams-attempts-to-constrain-bitcoin/
Understand that valuation is one of the metrics to gauge support for your chain. Your idea that onchain weather data is somehow a better metric is just laughable.
Think this is your main problem, assuming that consumers are dumb and that you can easily fool them out of their billions, just by some claim. The fact is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Nah the white paper lays down the concept, it doesn't mean it's set in stone for eternally and cannot be improved upon. Just because IPv6 improves on IPv4 doesn't mean it's not Internet anymore. Sorry that's just how protocols works.
I respect Satoshi's work, and his foresight to license the bitcoin under MIT license to give people options. But in science, we don't believe in deities, and don't just blindly follow, that's what cults do. If by some miracle someone actually gets their hands on Satoshi's GPG keys or Satoshi's private keys from the first blocks, sure i'll admit that that someone is Satoshi, if it's CSW (lol) i'd agree with him calling BSV real bitcoin or whatever. Then i would respectfully disagree with him on his current vision, and support the chain that implements layer 2 LN and taproot by whatever name they decide to call it. Point being is i support the idea of the open, permissionless, decentralized network, and could care less for individuals that stand behind it. You on the other hand appeal to authority and seem to be obsessed with the cult of Faketoshi.