Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 09:57:41 PM

Quote from: mynonce on Today at 09:36:52 PM

All others can and will.

No, all others cannot.

The block rewards from block 91,722 and 91,812 were overwritten by the block rewards from blocks 91,880 and 91,842 respectively, due to a bug which was fixed in BIP 30. Those 100 BTC are irretrievable.

There have been numerous blocks which have failed to claim the full block reward they were allowed to. These unclaimed coins are also irretrievable. Notable examples include block 501,726 which destroyed 12.5 BTC and block 526,591 which destroyed 6.25 BTC, but there are hundreds of other blocks totaling several dozen more permanently lost BTC.

Yes, I know that. These coins are not the majority of the unmoved coins. What I mean are coins, where it is possible to move them. That means, if a valid signature would lead to a transaction.

Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on Today at 09:04:00 PM

... Therefore, those coins can and should be considered part of the supply.

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 09:29:29 PM

... NASA's telescope captured a rare medal asteroid whose gold if brought down to Earth ... Is it realistically effectively possible to reach that asteroid and start moving huge, golden rocks? No. So, why should you assume they are part of the supply?

These coins aren't a far away medal asteroid that you have to bring down to Earth. They are here, and the distance is a signature. Therefore, those coins can and should be considered part of the supply.

If Satoshi signed a message with the Block 0 output address, that 'they won't move the 1.1 million coins', even than these coins were moveable.