Quote from: Royse777 on Today at 04:57:52 PM

The topic was good enough before, but right now I see hates around each other's and personal agenda. It's better to lock it. About LL and his campaigns, if anyone wants to join the campaigns, then just let them. Why would we control others? If anyone has any problem against LL then they can use trust flag and make a post about it. But let's not make this thread against him anymore.

Yeah, I think I will lock it soon, but I'm going to reply first.

Quote from: FatFork on Today at 04:47:46 PM

Quote from: Poker Player on Today at 04:01:35 PM

Go fuck yourself.

What do you call this if not harassing?

You don't know the definition of harrassment:

Essential Meaning of harass
1 : to annoy or bother (someone) in a constant or repeated way She was constantly harassed by the other students. He claims that he is being unfairly harassed by the police. He was accused of sexually harassing his secretary. [=of making unwanted sexual comments to her]
2 : to make repeated attacks against (an enemy) The troops harassed the defeated army throughout its retreat.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/harass

So, no that's not harassment.

Quote from: FatFork on Today at 04:47:46 PM

Nope. Sounds like the correct use of a trust system, especially for a neutral tag. dkbit98 expressed his personal opinion on this topic, you responded with personal insults and harassment.

So, according to you, he expressed his personal opinion and didn't insult me.

He called me a cyberbully, which is obviously false:

Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 03:17:43 PM

This looks like a classic case of cyberbullying to me...

Then he said this

Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 03:17:43 PM

(he is answering all questions like judge, jury and lawyer)

Which is obviously false and kind of insulting as well.

And finally he said this

Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 03:17:43 PM

I am thinking about creating new topic called: Do you think Poker Player behavior is acceptable.

Which he has not had the balls to do because he knows he has no compelling arguments to do so. And that veiled threat is also an insult because several red tags to Lighlord came out of this thread and what is implicit in what he says is that I could end up the same way.