Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 07:00:03 AM

Quote from: CryptorClub on November 30, 2021, 05:56:44 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on November 30, 2021, 05:48:52 PM

Quote from: CryptorClub on November 30, 2021, 07:53:09 AM

Hello. I understand your interest. Open my name is necessary for trust for you.

The quotes you mentioned is regarding GRN coin times (sha-256), all GRNs with no value was converted to GREEN (with filled liqudity) and some users successfully swapped on ETH in ethereum than on polygon blockchains.
We planned this swaps(to recover all GRNs to GREEN) one month only, while node of GRN still runned. All participants with GRN was filled with GREENs.

The changing rules - is just a decision not spend money from my pocket. All previous members get their bonus as mentioned before.

Game with dice and ponzi - was completely fail experiment with 1-2 users and transactions below $0.00001

Its history exist - its history has no problems - its clean.

I failed to see how and why the "variant" of the token I'm talking about and quoted matters. Just like your ponzi, what matters and proven by the quoted texts is not whether your "experiments" failed or not, it's about your post history and the intentions behind it.

You claimed to be a clean project, but you tried to lure investors into a ponzi scheme, where we all know the last person will suffers loss, as well as being very discouraged by the forum.

Please amuse and inform me, what's your definition of a clean reputation?

The truth is any token, any coin, any stock and even Fiat - is Ponzi, sir. ) I'm clear with myself to name things as it is. What is also clear, that the code of those dice and ponzi was open sourced and each person can view it.

An interesting topic, really, as it's been brought numerous times by many people from different projects and sides, and I've given myself a lot of time to think about this. I have to say, I'm somewhat agree that some token and coin is a ponzi, but it doesn't mean every coin is.

In ponzi, it's guaranteed that the earlier participants gets the benefit while the last person suffers the damage. In investments, where price fluctuates, the first person holding a token doesn't translates they're guaranteed a profit. Projects go ATL with price under the initial price, and people who "join" during this period could reap benefits than people who joined earlier at a higher price.

Now, keeping the ponzi topic aside for a while, as you keep insisting that you held a reputation, please inform us, what achievement do all of your projects achieve for the last three and a half years?

I'm happy that my info is make you think. Also you have strong interest in this discussion. Few years ago I've seen such kind of posts like posts of opponents, and right now is just science discussion. Thank you for that!

Money is unfair in any case, in my opinion. The only thing I've used it still, because I'm still social human, what is live in commerce world(society) and believe that we can grow as a social to new level. GGREEN token and part of GREEN (that not distributed) has not value as industrial, entrepreneurship or humans work as value. I see its value of hype (not hype as high yield but hype as trend of growing interest. Finally interest = money) right now.

What I propose - is to make this hype 📈 and spend part of turnover on matter things, that can be discussed in our Green community.

I like work of Jacque Fresco - $10M spent to advertise his youtube channel as education for English speaking audience will be great as one of thing, that can be done.
https://www.youtube.com/user/thevenusprojectmedia

I like 1Billiion trees project like... needs to see, which of them has a real result.

I like works of 100% waste processing.

I like renewable energy projects.

What about GREEN value - the liqudity, that you seen here, is made from fees from exchanges on greencoin.online ~42%, SEO results and sold advertising on greencoin.life ~42%, and one investor ~16%