Quote from: PeterHarrisonCY on March 23, 2014, 10:19:05 PM

Quote from: randomlygenerated on March 23, 2014, 08:13:56 PM

Quote from: NotLambchop on March 23, 2014, 07:57:36 PM

".0035 ... straight off the bat"? You should invest in Active Mining -- you'll triple your money "straight off the bat."

@bitpop: That white stuff in bird shit? That's birdshit too.

Well obviously it's under the assumption that Neo & Bee will be profitable - therein lies the risk. If I didn't think it had a chance at being profitable, I wouldn't have invested. I'd wager a higher chance of ROI on this than any of the mining shares though. The only people that profit out of those are the people who run them. But comparing NeoBee to mining shares is like comparing apples to oranges.

Right on! And even though I'm a big supported of NEO "Straight off the bat" is not a term I would use. Yes, we will receive 3.5mB before Danny receives a single penny in profits, but the first dividends (probably) wouldn't be that high. Perhaps in 9-12 months we would reach the threshold....but hey, in business an investment is considered good if you have your money back ($1 back for $1 invested) in a year. In a year, if we reach the threshold of 3.5mBTC we would have 1mBTC back for 1mBTC invested (if invested at 3.5mBTC which most people invested earlier) and if people want to cash out, then it would be 3.5mBTC per 3.5mBTC plus current stock price at the time....

I know that NEO & BEE would be profitable, the people are dedicated with a solid business plan and are the first company who are bringing Bitcoin to the masses

+1 Well put.