Ahh, I see now. So by "personal results", you're referring to the liquidity provided and funded by the project itself. And for daily volume, pardon the cluelessness, I am exre rarely use DEX and that was the first time I went to quickswap, so the cluelessness should be understandable. [1]
As for development, the irony is you feeling you duplicating info and still failed to provide the exact information asked although the question is quite clear. If I have to be more specific, this is the point I wanted to know:
On your
GREEN ANN thread, you made these milestones below,

And three years after, an update of achieved milestones are on what the next images show. I am divided between if you had an outdated info on yout website, or... none of the initial achievement are actually achieved.

So please re-inform us, what achievement --aside from launching websites-- do you get from the past three and a half years to support your claim of clean reputation?
[1]
On a completely different and unrelated topic, exploring quickswap lead me to a fake telegram group attempting a phising, please be warned, everyone.CryptorClub can't answer right now, so I will answer.
The original group of QuickSwap in Telegram is
https://t.me/QuickSwapDEXI ask to join Green Exchange group in telegram also.
https://t.me/crytalkAfter researching uniswap I feel less sense to use CEXes in future. Liquidity can load any person at any time, and at anytime withdraw (with his revenue from each swap 0.3% that was done during this time), using transactions to smart contracts directly. Web user interface, that you see - is just interface. If tomorrow something happens with Uniswap/Quickswap domain names - you will have access to smart contract with another user interface or send commands to ETH/Polygon blockchain directly.
Roadmap is really outdated, none of SEO milestones wasn't reached, because was not filled cap, even ridiculous 50$
SEO was really easy on that moment with stable money-flow (1500$ monthly)
We was at TOP3 with such keywords:
crypto exchange online
instant cryptocurrency exchange
and many other keywords
on that keywords, that on screenshot we was at TOP30, so it was easy to be on top3 with (50-100)$ monthly budget on each keyword.
Right now SEO is more difficult and more expensive. Without stable money-flow (from $10k monthly) no sense to start go to TOP again.
P.S. My opinion, that focus on clean reputation from member with nickname
holydarkness a little bit sharp, you don't think so? (I understand that percent of scams is around 50/50 in crypto)
Hi, thanks for jumping and filling in. I am assuming you are... another dev of this project?
Replying to your post script first, as I feel it's kinda right on point, I have to agree that the use of "clean reputation" would sounds a bit judgemental and has a tendency of negative tone. Although I have to counter-argue, just to be clear, that I raised the point because
CryptorClub kind of stressing, borderline bragging, that the project has a clean reputation, while I think there is quite a difference between clean reputation and no reputation, given they didn't mention any worth-mentioning development since the project started, especially when this "reputation" itself was tainted with a bump in the past where you encourage a ponzi scheme.
Dropping the ponzi matter for now to be ore focused on the matter at hand, a project, or someone, who barely has no development or something worth mentioning for years doesn't exactly translates as a clean reputation. To put into perspective, let's say someone invested certain amount of fund into a project, and the project has no development for three years, other than a casual "we'll launch an update soon" will it be true to claim that the project has a clean reputation? While it is also true that it is not necessarily translated as a "bad reputation", I think bragging that you're trustworthy just because you've been around for three years plus is not really well placed or necessary. Thus, "no reputation", not bad or good until proven otherwise. BUT, to move forward and giving benefit of doubts, I think it would better to drop the term "reputation" completely and focusing on the topic about the progress of the project, which leads us into the next part of your reply...
You said that the roadmap on the website is outdated. Why doesn't it be updated? I thought --based on the impression I got from CryptorClub's previous post as well as the goals you state on the website and ANN thread-- one of your focus are on the website, I can only imagine how an interface and the information provided on the site should plays a major part on it. Can you please shows the progress achieved during the past years? It will effectively shows how clean... ehm, how advanced your project is.
Last, just a small curiosity, assuming you're part of the team whose opinion matters to the progress of the project --at the point when I wrote this, I have no answer of your position, so I have to assume you're part of them-- and you are not in favor of CEX, then why trying to use Tokpie which leads to the trouble that pushes you to raise the accusation on the other thread?