Quote from: holydarkness on December 10, 2021, 04:07:06 PM

Quote from: LinksMe.ga on December 10, 2021, 01:20:10 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on December 10, 2021, 11:31:11 AM

Ahh, I see now. So by "personal results", you're referring to the liquidity provided and funded by the project itself. And for daily volume, pardon the cluelessness, I am exre rarely use DEX and that was the first time I went to quickswap, so the cluelessness should be understandable. [1]

As for development, the irony is you feeling you duplicating info and still failed to provide the exact information asked although the question is quite clear. If I have to be more specific, this is the point I wanted to know:

On your GREEN ANN thread, you made these milestones below,

[...]

And three years after, an update of achieved milestones are on what the next images show. I am divided between if you had an outdated info on yout website, or... none of the initial achievement are actually achieved.

[...]

So please re-inform us, what achievement --aside from launching websites-- do you get from the past three and a half years to support your claim of clean reputation?

[...]

CryptorClub can't answer right now, so I will answer.
The original group of QuickSwap in Telegram is https://t.me/QuickSwapDEX
I ask to join Green Exchange group in telegram also. https://t.me/crytalk

After researching uniswap I feel less sense to use CEXes in future. Liquidity can load any person at any time, and at anytime withdraw (with his revenue from each swap 0.3% that was done during this time), using transactions to smart contracts directly. Web user interface, that you see - is just interface. If tomorrow something happens with Uniswap/Quickswap domain names - you will have access to smart contract with another user interface or send commands to ETH/Polygon blockchain directly.

Roadmap is really outdated, none of SEO milestones wasn't reached, because was not filled cap, even ridiculous 50$
SEO was really easy on that moment with stable money-flow (1500$ monthly)
We was at TOP3 with such keywords:
crypto exchange online
instant cryptocurrency exchange
and many other keywords

on that keywords, that on screenshot we was at TOP30, so it was easy to be on top3 with (50-100)$ monthly budget on each keyword.

Right now SEO is more difficult and more expensive. Without stable money-flow (from $10k monthly) no sense to start go to TOP again.

P.S. My opinion, that focus on clean reputation from member with nickname holydarkness a little bit sharp, you don't think so? (I understand that percent of scams is around 50/50 in crypto)

Hi, thanks for jumping and filling in. I am assuming you are... another dev of this project?

Replying to your post script first, as I feel it's kinda right on point, I have to agree that the use of "clean reputation" would sounds a bit judgemental and has a tendency of negative tone. Although I have to counter-argue, just to be clear, that I raised the point because CryptorClub kind of stressing, borderline bragging, that the project has a clean reputation, while I think there is quite a difference between clean reputation and no reputation, given they didn't mention any worth-mentioning development since the project started, especially when this "reputation" itself was tainted with a bump in the past where you encourage a ponzi scheme.

Dropping the ponzi matter for now to be ore focused on the matter at hand, a project, or someone, who barely has no development or something worth mentioning for years doesn't exactly translates as a clean reputation. To put into perspective, let's say someone invested certain amount of fund into a project, and the project has no development for three years, other than a casual "we'll launch an update soon" will it be true to claim that the project has a clean reputation? While it is also true that it is not necessarily translated as a "bad reputation", I think bragging that you're trustworthy just because you've been around for three years plus is not really well placed or necessary. Thus, "no reputation", not bad or good until proven otherwise. BUT, to move forward and giving benefit of doubts, I think it would better to drop the term "reputation" completely and focusing on the topic about the progress of the project, which leads us into the next part of your reply...

You said that the roadmap on the website is outdated. Why doesn't it be updated? I thought --based on the impression I got from CryptorClub's previous post as well as the goals you state on the website and ANN thread-- one of your focus are on the website, I can only imagine how an interface and the information provided on the site should plays a major part on it. Can you please shows the progress achieved during the past years? It will effectively shows how clean... ehm, how advanced your project is.

Last, just a small curiosity, assuming you're part of the team whose opinion matters to the progress of the project --at the point when I wrote this, I have no answer of your position, so I have to assume you're part of them-- and you are not in favor of CEX, then why trying to use Tokpie which leads to the trouble that pushes you to raise the accusation on the other thread?

Hello. You have strong interest on this topic. Don't know why. Are you really interested to invest? Curiosity? Community interests?
I'm not full-time part of team, but write here covering interests of Green team direction and CryptorClub account was muted on 30 day because of "incentive posts" on Bounty topic (it wasn't, because those topic collect addresses for airdrop). Anyway that was recognized as incentive and answer from CryptorClub, seems we got in New Year.
Maybe needed best, experienced Bounty manager, to manage that thread.

I thing, that branch of clean reputation regarding ponzi was closed, because whole finance system is ponzi, no?
I'll try to explain what means exactly under clean reputation.

We not planning to make hurt or harm to other people
In our task not set to make scam project

We understand that:
ANY money relationships - is Unfair
ANY user of any coin (fiat or crypto) has less benefits than user, who print this money, or buy it earlier

When written ponzi and write about all percentage and rules(mathematics, open source) of each transaction - is fair.
When scheme is ponzi - and written, that is not or hidden - in not fair
Is much fair, than to write Casino and user don't know source code (percentages, mathematics).
In casino user lose in any case - casino wins.
In ponzi user wins, in time when next user comes.

user1 buys unit for 1.1 - (next user2 pays 1.2tokens and user1 gets this 1.2tokens) - (than user1 can rebuy next unit for 1.3 to get 1.4 from next one)
this chain mathematically infinite, and even theoretically (because of newborn people) - and unfair.
(AND IT HAS OPEN SOURCED CODE)

For me is absolutely has similar principe as borrow money for %
Borrow money for % - unfair (because nowhere to get %)

World - Unfair
(and it HASN'T source code, or its still not de-compiled, at least by our team)

We are clean to understand this and retranslate it as is. No darkness here. User should understand this. Everyone should understand is!

Additionally, ponzi was not successful at all. There was <100 transactions with sha256 greencoin (GRN). That has no value at that moment. Whole turnover was less than $0.0001
All GRN at that moment was swapped to GREEN by requests. One of users swapped his mined 0.5M+ GRNs onto 5M+ GREENs ($1k) and when we start load liqudity in GREEN, sold it. Story of another our loss as project, because this was money from our personal work, but not from other users investments.

Work of developer is to fix mistakes, that he type before. We are going this way. Using possibilities and resources we have and do best.

Our plan for all revenue (GREEN + GGREEN) that we have:
- Reinvest into its promotion to grow it price and our community
- Finance a lot of "Green" things that we post before (its about clean reputation also, we still has this plan) like promoting educational movies of Jacque Fresco - We start to think about it, when the free of liqudity cap will be $10M+
- Finance our team

Regarding dropping development and updating roadmap on the site.

Whole project(s) has four servers (0.9 Tb only text data, no images and no video)
This project(s) was programmed using at least 7 computer languages (SOL, SQL, HTML, CSS, Unix, PHP, Javascript)
human languages (pure Text English, different User Interfaces, voice negotiations, videos, social promotion (Bitcointalk, Telegram, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube))
SEO - search engine optimization, that was spent 50k in total to research and be on top for ~1+ year on a lot of specific targeted keywords.

Greencoin.life has more than 10 Million unique visits for these three years (up to 40k+ unique visits daily) 100M+ pages
Greencoin.online has turnover more than $10M and earn 0.5% fees on it. No serious fails.

and all of these things was work of one man. Sorry, for not updated milestones, and still not created WhitePaper.

For all of these things we got only one serious investor, that believe in us and part of GREEN tokens belongs to him.
one investor.
few other with amounts ~200$, that we tracked. We don't know about rest wallets, if they active.
And after 3.5 years project alive.

Main reason, why not updated roadmap, because our time to update it not worth it.
You may see, that GGREEN was launched already 13 days.
GGREENs - extremely cheap.
Faucet was launched 12 days (all needed to pay gas ~$0.01 to receive 100k tokens).
And there is no a single human transaction for these two weeks, except ours. ZERO
With whole work done. Result for GGREEN - 0

Roadmap is not core of our project as result, is just vector. Because a lot of decisions and priorities was modified. Whole site should be like a diamond and modified to WEB3, with brilliant English (that we haven't, its not our native language) and this is a lot of work. Updating roadmap is nothing, in my vision. SEO works and budgets should be recalculated from the scratch, but at most other things is still right, it reflects our concept.

Migration path of coin was:
from SHA256 to ETH ERC20 (standard)
Now Polygon ERC20 (from May 2021) that is fully bridged at anytime between Ethereum and Polygon.

About CEX. There is a single reason why we tried to work with Tokpie, is that they convinced, that they can list our token on CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko and Etherscan. (At least one of these things should be great for us). None of this, they not finalize. 750$, on that moment, is loss. 30k Green Tokens ($6.56 value on this moment) on their balance.

We made a lot of mistakes, but at each time working to fix it. That's why our our reputation, minds, hearts and souls seems clean. Not? We will try to fix.

holydarkness, I spent a lot of my time to write this post. Hope its affect not only on you, but on whole Bitcointalk community.

Our whole financial system with fiat, cryptos, economies, competitions and monopolies - is big collapsing and unfair thing. 80% of budget of each government spent on security from other governments. The single reason why we use money, because whole world playing this rules right now, and difficult to survive and grow up without them, when whole world depends on it.

Works of Jacque Fresco is the trial to think out of the box and think about global community rules without money. Its important for Education.
Its without other smart things(included in roadmap), that we can finance until build stable concept of new relationships.

--
Hope its clear, Green Team