Quote from: rakec on December 17, 2021, 10:24:31 PM

Quote from: holydarkness on December 17, 2021, 11:22:18 AM

I think it's safe to start proceeding with the negative tag. I tried to reach them via their TG channel and they removed me right away. I don't think they'll heed the invitation you put on their thread

One of main things that I did well in my life is removing negative people from it. Trying to spend the time just with positive and good will people. In a crypto world there is a plenty negative people, that are spreading negativity in the group to others. From one side its good that you posted info there so we know what is happening here. On the other side you can light the fire with negativity on project that didnt started yet. I didnt lose 6 months on coding to have negative comments before start. I have personally told to mods to delete all the fuds from the group. Some of them deleted your comment too.

I'll have to say that you have a very unique definition of "negativity", my invitation on the TG --as it appears to me-- sounds neutral enough. It didn't judge you of a misconduct, it invites you to come to the thread and give your explanation.

FUD is based on a false information, whereas the information I gave on the TG --that there is an unsolved accusation waiting for your answer-- is a pure fact. If you tried to defend yourself by blaming your mods, that you didn't know about it at all, that all of it were the mod's, weren't your team fact-check these "FUD" before they decide if it's indeed a FUD or simply just a situation they need to solve? Did you check their competency to de-escalate a situation or you just blindly hire --hopefully not a freelance-- mods because you're too busy with development?

If we may depart a little bit further from this point, that a simple invitation to answer to an accusation is counteracted with kicking the subject from the group and instantly labeling it as a FUD, it is not too far fetched to think that this is what would be your project's policy, where if someone posted something a tad bit "negative" --that you evidently did very well removing from your live-- they'll be automatically banned instead of get any help regarding their concern.

"Oh, I use the platform and I found this bug..." BAN
"Admin, can you please help me? I think one of the freelancer didn't deliver what's promi..." BAN
"Hi, I asked for a withdrawal for my freelancing job and I know it's been less than 24h, but.." BAN

Quote from: rakec on December 17, 2021, 09:34:47 PM

So please before accuse some project to be a scam, because it has some parts of text of some other project whitepaper, check other details too.

Second, challenge accepted. Let's give you benefits of doubt and talk about details of your project that you've invested so much time on it that you had to hire a freelancer to write your WP and didn't have time to check it --more of this below-- I usually did this on the ANN thread but given the discussion already started here, so let's stay here.

These following screenshots are from your website [archived]

Riddle me this, your proposed main feature is a decentralized freelancing platform without a middleman, which in traditional definition, an employer will meet an employee directly and the payment will happen between both parties without other entities in between, so how does "the lowest fees for using this platform will be with penny token as payment option" fits into this? You declare that the job will happen with no middleman, but you require fees for each job done?

I am not really an expert on this field, so I can't be 100% certain, but a small google search and glancing at the articles provided reveals that there are ways to get around this --disregarding extra fees-- like this or this.

On top of it, comparing your project to the traditional freelancing platform is comparing apple-to-orange. There are several crypto-based freelancing platforms that should be more fair to be used as comparison as they're better suited to be compared feature-wise, payment-wise, etc.

And again, riddle me this, how exactly does a project has a 98.6% of total supply and not 100%? Your total supply will always be 100%, your circulating supply could be less than 100% due to burning, locking, etc. but I don't think a total supply can be less than 100%, unless there's something wrong with my logic?

Quote from: rakec on December 17, 2021, 09:34:47 PM

The answer is above. Of course I cant double check everything. I can check the token code, but not whitepaper. I dont know how to check it at all? To copy part by part in google and look for similar results? Sorry but I dont have time for it anyway. Need to work on platforms with devs

Next, the notoriously well-known excuse of "we hire a freelancer".

Let's amuse ourselves for a while by accepting that you hired a freelancer to build your whitepaper, the first and most severe mistake a project can do --according to my mind-- is outsourcing people with bare knowledge of your project to write your whitepaper. If you're so serious and well invested on your project, you'll spare some time to write your own whitepaper, because no one would ever be able to explain the project in details like its own creator, especially since it's just a ten pages of whitepaper, with the first one is a cover, the second last is a chart, and the last page is links.

You can't do that because English is not your main language? Here, a protip for dummy, wrote them in your own language and hire a translator instead of a content writer. It's a no brainer, really, every dev smart and serious enough to build a project will figure this out, but hey, I've said it's a protip for dummy, anyway.

And as promised on earlier paragraph, I find it ironic that you as a freelancing platform got "scammed" by a freelancer, that you didn't check the work at all, no matter what the excuse is --again, it's a ten page of work. Nonetheless, should this be used as a reference how your platform will perform in the future? Where there are no way to safeguard a project because the team are so busy with their things?

In conclusion, if you ask me, I don't think we can use busy as an excuse because, as mentioned before, if you're so well invested on your project --and still decide to hire a clueless third party, somehow-- you'll at least give them a read, you'll make time for it. So tell me, which one is it? Were you too invested on the project that you can't afford to risk it to get derailed by a negativity of a "FUD" before you even started, or were you too careless that you don't bother to wrote your thought into WP or at least check the job?

Quote from: rakec on December 17, 2021, 09:34:47 PM

[...]
By the way the only reason why I wasn't using this account for 2 years is slow support of bitcointalk forum. When I got account back, I lost a will to write . Proof is also here: https://ibb.co/Vq56qjk

Last, but first thing first, just to be sure, the date is the non-US format? It's on DD/MM/YYYY, which means you wrote on first of February 2019, and you get replies --not to mention the two that's not displayed between these mails-- on fourth of February 2019. You call that slow?

Second, the statement that you lost your will to write is somewhat also questionabe, given (1) you made several post after your account recovered, so much for the lost of willingness and, (2) your post before is already sporadic, with the last entry before 2019 is 2017. If you reasoned that you've been hacked for a few months prior to the email date, you're saying you barely wrote anything in 2017 and 2018? Or were you saying that it took you two years to realize you're compromised? Or that you've wrote since 2017 to the admins of this forum and only got your ticket solved in February 2019?