Proves for accusation that the project is a scam are sent to moderators. Hope that proves enough to see that all of them are wrong.
Whitepaper is 1% of the project.
Code is 90%. So before anyone accuses someone of being a scammer, he should check the code, right?
If we wanted to scam people, we would probably make a token in 5 minutes on some launchpad. I don't think that scammers are working 6 months on code to scam people.
-
So accusing someone of a scam because he copied some parts from whitepaper is fine.
But that could do 10 years old kid. Maybe he will look for other details before he does what they have done.
I expected more from Hero and Legendary members on this forum.
This is the problem if you will resort to paying a third party to do one of your important documents.
Whitepaper is like a soul of your project, so at least one of your teams should have reviewed its content before publishing.
I do agree that this document is just one of the many parts of the project but make sure you have time to look at it because it states all about your project.
To gain trust from the community will take time. So if you can't get the funds here, better look for private investors and accomplish your roadmap.
Only time will tell how sincere you are with this project. So don't rely from any crowdsourcing activities now that you have negative trust here.