Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:31:45 AM

Each NFT token on the other hand represents something else in this case a piece of art, and if that piece is destroyed for example that token becomes meaningless.

Be careful with it then. Behave same like you would with your private keys.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:31:45 AM

The fact that Louvre museum has a version of it with a certificate doesn't mean much any longer.

It's because it doesn't just have a version of it. It has the original, authentic painting drawn by Leonardo da Vinci. Whether new painters draw the exact same painting, using the same palette Leonardo used in 1503 or not, they can't recreate Mona Lisa, but only replicas.

Quote from: pooya87 on Today at 04:31:45 AM

No it won't. Blockchain is the most expensive and inefficient form of database whether it is about storage, security or searching inside it.

And yet, the most censorship resistant. Can't you acknowledge how significant it is if we, two, came into an agreement that we have no need for notaries? That we can exchange our rights this way, in this block chain? Same thing happened in 2009. Some people switched from legal money to bitcoin, because it was more satisfactory to them.

You can't really deny that there's not even one valid argument in favor of NFTs.

Quote from: BBGC NFT on Today at 12:21:39 PM

If you can bring NFTs to the Bitcoin blockchain, I will bring back my 2015 'NFTs' to your project.

What do you mean? The whole thread shows that NFTs never left the Bitcoin network. They're just called Colored Coins.